Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:44:17PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I took a quick look at the current status:
[...]
> That leaves aspectj as the only blocker:
With the new aspectj in testing, this is no longer an issue. I added a removal
hint for
webkitgtk/2.4.11-4 eclipse/3.8.1-11
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 19:34:55 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:01:07 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [...]
> > I tried to sort out what I could find as required for getting the
> > ancient eclipse out of testing in [1]:
> >
> > 1. src:bnd
> > You
Markus Koschany:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:01:07 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [...]
>> I tried to sort out what I could find as required for getting the
>> ancient eclipse out of testing in [1]:
>>
>> 1. src:bnd
>> You fixed that already.
>>
>> 2. batik -> maven -> guice ->
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:01:07 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
[...]
> I tried to sort out what I could find as required for getting the
> ancient eclipse out of testing in [1]:
>
> 1. src:bnd
> You fixed that already.
>
> 2. batik -> maven -> guice -> libspring-java -> aspectj ->
Le 15/11/2017 à 17:56, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
> I suspect we build the aspectj eclipse plugin but don't even install it
> in the binary package. I'll see if this can be disabled.
Long story short, it can't. aspectj deeply depends on eclipse jdt. Also
upgrading to the latest version isn't
Le 15/11/2017 à 17:01, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> 2. batik -> maven -> guice -> libspring-java -> aspectj -> eclipse-platform
> Is there some good way to break this dependency chain?
I suspect we build the aspectj eclipse plugin but don't even install it
in the binary package. I'll see if this can
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:08:10AM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>...
> We should definitely try to avoid this sort of dependency mess in the
> future by packaging important libraries like eclipse-rcp in a separate
> source package. That would be similar to what we are doing whith
> Netbeans and
Am 09.11.2017 um 21:34 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
[...]
> Have you considered dropping the libswt-webkit-gtk-3-jni dependency
> from eclipse-rcp? Then the swt-gtk source package could stop building
> libswt-webkit-gtk-3-jni and we could complete the webkitgtk removal
> from Debian Testing.
>
> Thanks,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Am 20.10.2017 um 18:43 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
>>> Are there any objections to me requesting that the ftpmasters remove
>>> swt-gtk and eclipse
Am 01.11.2017 um 22:04 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:23:32PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Am 01.11.2017 um 20:47 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
>>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 20/10/2017 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:23:32PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 01.11.2017 um 20:47 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >> Le 20/10/2017 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
> >>
> >>> Never mind. I tried doing the dak queries and
Am 01.11.2017 um 20:47 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 20/10/2017 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
>>
>>> Never mind. I tried doing the dak queries and I eventually got more
>>> than 500 reverse-depends before I gave up.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 20/10/2017 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
>
>> Never mind. I tried doing the dak queries and I eventually got more
>> than 500 reverse-depends before I gave up. (Attached)
>
> Funny, I never realized that src:eclipse
Le 21/10/2017 à 00:33, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> Please claim this bug or tell me when you start to work on something
> related to Eclipse or Tycho, so that we avoid double work.
For now I'm just working on swt4-gtk. I'll ping the list if I feel ready
for some tycho/eclipse action.
Am 21.10.2017 um 00:24 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Le 20/10/2017 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
>
>> Never mind. I tried doing the dak queries and I eventually got more
>> than 500 reverse-depends before I gave up. (Attached)
>
> Funny, I never realized that src:eclipse was basically holding most
Le 20/10/2017 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
> Never mind. I tried doing the dak queries and I eventually got more
> than 500 reverse-depends before I gave up. (Attached)
Funny, I never realized that src:eclipse was basically holding most of
the Java packages. Maybe this package deserves some
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 20.10.2017 um 18:43 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
>> Are there any objections to me requesting that the ftpmasters remove
>> swt-gtk and eclipse from Debian Testing so that we can complete the
>> webkitgtk removal from
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #681726 [src:eclipse] eclipse: Upgrade to latest upstream release (HELP
WANTED)
Bug #725377 [src:eclipse] eclipse: Upgrade to latest upstream release (HELP
WANTED)
Bug #732959 [src:eclipse] eclipse: Upgrade to latest upstream release (HELP
18 matches
Mail list logo