Bug#837712: Processed: severity of 837712 is serious
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 05:45:39PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 21/10/16 at 16:32 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > Bug #837712 [src:xemacs21] xemacs21: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled > > > Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > > I've still not seen any usable reproduction instructions. > Well it fails to build in a standard, up-to-date unstable chroot here. > That was what I implied with the '# now fails in unstable' comment in my > BTS control message. > You cannot reproduce it? Could you send a build log so that we could > diff it with mine? Oh, someone uploaded these compilers to unstable? Nice :( I'll go take a look. Comments in the BTS messages really aren't visible, the messages are very noisy so it's hard to spot them. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#837712: Processed: severity of 837712 is serious
On 21/10/16 at 16:32 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 02:08:47PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > Bug #837712 [src:xemacs21] xemacs21: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled > > Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > > I've still not seen any usable reproduction instructions. Well it fails to build in a standard, up-to-date unstable chroot here. That was what I implied with the '# now fails in unstable' comment in my BTS control message. You cannot reproduce it? Could you send a build log so that we could diff it with mine? Lucas
Bug#837712: Processed: severity of 837712 is serious
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 02:08:47PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Bug #837712 [src:xemacs21] xemacs21: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled > Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' I've still not seen any usable reproduction instructions. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
