Hi,
On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 10:18:13 +0200 Hubert Chathi wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2022 00:49:15 +0200, Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras
said:
>
> [...]
>
> > - Drop the javascript bindings for olm (libjs-olm). The only reverse
> > dependency of libjs-olm is libjs-matrix-sdk which itself has no
> > reverse
On Sat, 25 Jun 2022 00:49:15 +0200, Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras
said:
[...]
> - Drop the javascript bindings for olm (libjs-olm). The only reverse
> dependency of libjs-olm is libjs-matrix-sdk which itself has no
> reverse dependencies.
FWIW, libjs-matrix-js-sdk upstream is looking into
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 13:33:55 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I didn't know that there was some coordination required between binaryen and
> emscripten. Nobody talked about that in the past. Sorry to ditch your request
> but I don't plan to maintain emscripten.
Thanks for your reply
Hi,
I didn't know that there was some coordination required between binaryen and
emscripten. Nobody talked about that in the past. Sorry to ditch your request
but I don't plan to maintain emscripten. The only reason why I introduced
binaryen and wabt to Debian was to compile web assembly code
Dear maintainers,
On Thu, 26 May 2022 08:44:43 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> >
> > Install main build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
> >
Source: olm
Version: 3.2.11~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
