Hi,
On 07/12/22 at 08:19 +0100, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> @Lucas: if the rebuild goes fine, will this bug report be automatically
> closed? Otherwise, is there a web page where the results can be tracked?
Not automatically no. Rebuilds are mostly a manual process, with a bunch
of helpers
* Michele Martone [2022-12-05 15:31]:
In my 20221204@23:42 (yesterday) email I forgot to add that on my chroot
setup, I can reproduce latex failing to compile the file I was attaching.
In that setup I have a utf8x.def too, sized 8036 bytes and with md5sum
21f7ac37aafb6cfeddbb196b8bfd6280 .
On 20221205@15:59, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> * Michele Martone [2022-12-04 23:42]:
>
> > latex is not able to compile a rsbtest-generated file looking like the
> > one I attach. The problematic line is:
> >
> > \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} [...]
>
> It compiles fine here:
>
> $
* Michele Martone [2022-12-04 23:42]:
latex is not able to compile a rsbtest-generated
file looking like the one I attach.
The problematic line is:
\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
[...]
It compiles fine here:
$ pdflatex test.tex > /dev/null && grep utf8x.def test.log
Hi Rafael,
latex is not able to compile a rsbtest-generated
file looking like the one I attach.
The problematic line is:
\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
and there are two alternative fixes to be applied before autoreconf:
Patch suggestion 1:
sed 's/utf8x//g' -i rsbtest/rsbtest.cpp
Patch
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 michelemart...@users.sourceforge.net
Bug #1016332 [src:librsb] librsb: FTBFS: gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:920: qtests]
Error 1
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'michelemart...@users.sourceforge.net'.
> tags -1 unreproducible
Bug #1016332 [src:librsb]
Control: forwarded -1 michelemart...@users.sourceforge.net
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Hi Michele,
There is a bug report filed against the librsb package (Bug#1016332 [1])
that has severity level "serious". This is blocking the package entering
testing and, therefore, librsb will be
7 matches
Mail list logo