I have replaced Font Awesome 5 with Fork Awesome and have tested it with
finalcif.
The icons look a bit different but it works.
Hi,
On 2022-12-12 00:17, Bastian Germann wrote:
finalcif's source has some fa5 prefixes, so the package might be affected.
Andrius, can you please comment on this?
Yes, these are calls to qtawesome.icon('fa5.save') and the like. But if
fonts can be drop-in-replaced with ones from
finalcif's source has some fa5 prefixes, so the package might be affected.
Andrius, can you please comment on this?
forwarded https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtawesome/issues/220
thanks
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 10:15:58AM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Am 09.12.22 um 07:49 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
> > I saw you have excluded the files in unreleased 1.2.1+dfsg-1 version of
> > the package. Are you planning to
Hi Andrius,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 10:59:35AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Hi,
> [...]
>
> I got the impression that the removed fonts can be drop-in-replaced with
> ones from DFSG-compatible fork from fonts-fork-awesome, but I did not check
> that. I am in contact with finalcif upstream and
Am 09.12.22 um 07:49 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
I saw you have excluded the files in unreleased 1.2.1+dfsg-1 version of the package. Are you planning to upload it soon,
or are there any blockers?
It has not built yet because the example.py is run via d/rules:
Am 09.12.22 um 08:28 schrieb Julian Gilbey:
but finalcif and openlp's maintainers might not
realise the issue
openlp is not affected. I know the package and have uploaded it several times.
Hi,
On 2022-12-09 09:28, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I have seen this and will deal with it soon. Have you contacted the
authors of the package to discuss this issue?
No, I did not.
Anyway, a quick check on testing shows that there are three packages
depending on python3-qtawesome: finalcif,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 07:28:37AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> [...]
> I also forgot to push my 1.2.1-1 changes to salsa, unfortunately.
> Oops! But that's history now.
Ah, I never released that version, so please ignore this comment!
Salsa is fine.
Best wishes,
Julian
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 08:49:10AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Hi Bastian,
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 16:16:19 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote:
> > This package contains three font files
> > /usr/share/python-qtawesome/fonts/fontawesome5-*-webfont.ttf
> > which are licensed freely but are not built
Hi Bastian,
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 16:16:19 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote:
This package contains three font files
/usr/share/python-qtawesome/fonts/fontawesome5-*-webfont.ttf
which are licensed freely but are not built from source and cannot be built
from source
(missing build system). #902981
Package: python-qtawesome-common
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
This package contains three font files
/usr/share/python-qtawesome/fonts/fontawesome5-*-webfont.ttf
which are licensed freely but are not built from source and cannot be built
from source
(missing build system). #902981
12 matches
Mail list logo
