Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2023 16:31:55 +0000
with message-id <e1qy7op-007pra...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1043492: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027341,
regarding ruby-bourne: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: Error:
test_should_stub_two_different_class_methods_again(StubbaExampleTest):
ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 4, expected 3)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1027341: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027341
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-bourne
Version: 1.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221230 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Error: test_should_stub_two_different_class_methods_again(StubbaExampleTest):
> ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 4, expected 3)
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lib/bourne/invocation.rb:8:in `initialize'
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/mocha-1.16.1/lib/mocha/mock.rb:319:in
> `new'
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/mocha-1.16.1/lib/mocha/mock.rb:319:in
> `handle_method_call'
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/mocha-1.16.1/lib/mocha/stubbed_method.rb:60:in
> `block in define_new_method'
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/acceptance/stubba_example_test.rb:90:in
> `should_stub_two_different_class_methods'
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/acceptance/stubba_example_test.rb:69:in
> `test_should_stub_two_different_class_methods_again'
> 66: end
> 67:
> 68: def test_should_stub_two_different_class_methods_again
> => 69: should_stub_two_different_class_methods
> 70: end
> 71:
> 72: private
> ===============================================================================
> : (0.001355)
>
> Finished in 0.452356416 seconds.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 137 tests, 79 assertions, 3 failures, 81 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0
> notifications
> 38.6861% passed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 302.86 tests/s, 174.64 assertions/s
> rake aborted!
> Command failed with status (1): [ruby -w -I"test"
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/3.1.0/gems/rake-13.0.6/lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb
> "test/acceptance/mocha_example_test.rb" "test/acceptance/spy_test.rb"
> "test/acceptance/stubba_example_test.rb" "test/unit/assert_received_test.rb"
> "test/unit/have_received_test.rb" "test/unit/invocation_test.rb"
> "test/unit/mock_test.rb" "test/unit/mockery_test.rb" "test/test_helper.rb"
> "test/test_runner.rb" -v]
>
> Tasks: TOP => default
> (See full trace by running task with --trace)
> ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed:
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/12/30/ruby-bourne_1.6.0-3_unstable.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20221230;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20221230&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.6.0-3+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package ruby-bourne has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1043492
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.
Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
