Am Wed, May 17, 2023 at 02:07:22PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:58:58AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I hope I was following developers reference about t-p-u[6] correctly
> > and pushed
> > I've choosen the version 1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1 to match
> > the requirement
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:58:58AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:49:55PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:25:15PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > > I personally prefer "1" over 2 as it is less noise (and effort).
> >
> > On second thoughts, I
Hi again,
Am Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:49:55PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:25:15PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > I personally prefer "1" over 2 as it is less noise (and effort).
>
> On second thoughts, I think sending it via testing-proposed-updates
> would be a
On 16 May 2023 at 20:13, Nilesh Patra wrote:
| Uh, no. Maybe you misunderstood my suggestion. The t-p-u way was for
Indeed!
| r-base can continue to stay where it already is at the moment :)
Yep.
Dirk
--
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 09:31:20AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 16 May 2023 at 19:49, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> | On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:25:15PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> | > I personally prefer "1" over 2 as it is less noise (and effort).
> |
> | On second thoughts, I think sending
Am Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:49:55PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:25:15PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > I personally prefer "1" over 2 as it is less noise (and effort).
>
> On second thoughts, I think sending it via testing-proposed-updates
> would be a better thing to
On 16 May 2023 at 19:49, Nilesh Patra wrote:
| On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:25:15PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
| > I personally prefer "1" over 2 as it is less noise (and effort).
|
| On second thoughts, I think sending it via testing-proposed-updates
| would be a better thing to do, as this case
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 07:25:15PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> I personally prefer "1" over 2 as it is less noise (and effort).
On second thoughts, I think sending it via testing-proposed-updates
would be a better thing to do, as this case perfectly fits the problem.
It's be same effort in both
On 16 May 2023 at 19:25, Nilesh Patra wrote:
| On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 03:01:10PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
| > when fixing bug #1035428 I realised test suite issues with
| >
| > r-cran-thematic [1]
| >-> Error in `svglite_(filename, bg, width, height, pointsize,
standalone,
| >
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 08:26:21AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Note that none of this affects the release. My recommendation is temporarily
> suspend the autopkgtest in those affected packages.
No, don't do that as they indicate a new r-base being pulled as one of
the dependencies (which
Hi
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 03:01:10PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> when fixing bug #1035428 I realised test suite issues with
>
> r-cran-thematic [1]
>-> Error in `svglite_(filename, bg, width, height, pointsize, standalone,
> always_valid)`: Graphics API version mismatch
>
>
On 16 May 2023 at 15:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Hi,
|
| when fixing bug #1035428 I realised test suite issues with
|
| r-cran-thematic [1]
|-> Error in `svglite_(filename, bg, width, height, pointsize, standalone,
| always_valid)`: Graphics API version mismatch
|
|
Hi,
when fixing bug #1035428 I realised test suite issues with
r-cran-thematic [1]
-> Error in `svglite_(filename, bg, width, height, pointsize, standalone,
always_valid)`: Graphics API version mismatch
r-cran-treescape [2]
r-cran-treespace [3]
-> error is given if lambda is
13 matches
Mail list logo