On 10.05.2023 11:18, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi again,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
broken symlinks:
OK, had a closer look: the "Debian Fonts Task Force" replaced the
"Junicode 1" by "Junicode 2" although they may behave differently
"Users of the
> If you say the broken symlinks are not really a problem for bookworm (and
Broken symlinks in the TEXMF dirs are not a problem, since kpathsea will
ignore them.
So the worst thing is that some font is not available, that is hardly a
problem since the fonts are not generally used.
Best
Norbert
Control: tags -1 + bookworm-ignore
On 10.05.2023 22:47, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 10/05/2023 22.24, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi,
42a992dff6dd2b54ce0ffc10367a29913e062c0b, else there would be no upgrade
path from bullseye to bookworm. I have to delay the fix to post-bookworm.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + bookworm-ignore
Bug #1035857 [texlive-fonts-extra] texlive-fonts-extra: broken font symlinks
for junicode
Added tag(s) bookworm-ignore.
--
1035857: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035857
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
On 10/05/2023 22.24, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
42a992dff6dd2b54ce0ffc10367a29913e062c0b, else there would be no upgrade
path from bullseye to bookworm. I have to delay the fix to post-bookworm.
42f75ab3ead843b6b04edc6f4aed7498cb53101f . This could be reverted before
bookworm, I'd need to build a
On 10.05.2023 11:18, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hello,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
broken symlinks:
3m10.3s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/truetype/public/junicode/Junicod ->
Package: texlive-fonts-extra
Version: 2022.20230122-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
broken symlinks:
3m10.3s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
7 matches
Mail list logo
