Hi,
On 2024-01-15 17:34, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Andrius Merkys
The patch proposed in #1042610 does not fix test failure. Interestingly, the
failure seems to be nondeterministic: after patching #1042610 some builds
succeed. However, I did not manage to find the root cause.
The difference
Re: Andrius Merkys
> The patch proposed in #1042610 does not fix test failure. Interestingly, the
> failure seems to be nondeterministic: after patching #1042610 some builds
> succeed. However, I did not manage to find the root cause.
The difference between a working and a failing run is this
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 19:35:09 +0100 s3v wrote:
please see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042610
for a proposed patch.
The patch proposed in #1042610 does not fix test failure. Interestingly,
the failure seems to be nondeterministic: after patching #1042610 some
Dear Maintainer,
please see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042610
for a proposed patch.
Kind Regards
Source: behave
Version: 1.2.6-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231028 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
5 matches
Mail list logo