Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1055228 [src:plplot] plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)
Bug #1055750 [src:plplot] gfortran: [armhf] Yield SIGBUS when compiling with
-fstack-clash-protection
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
Severity set to 'important' f
Control: severity -1 important
* Sebastiaan Couwenberg [2024-01-01 20:13]:
plplot got removed from armhf, the severity of this issue could be
lowered to important to not have the package removed from testing.
Thanks, I am doing it hereby.
Best,
Rafael Laboissière
plplot got removed from armhf, the severity of this issue could be
lowered to important to not have the package removed from testing.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
S when compiling with
-fstack-clash-protection
Bug #1055750 [plplot] gfortran: [armhf] Yield SIGBUS when compiling with
-fstack-clash-protection
Added tag(s) sid, trixie, confirmed, and help.
Bug #1055228 [plplot] plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)
Merged 1055228 1055750
>
End of message,
severity 1055750 serious
merge 1055750 1055228
Control: reassign -1 plplot
Control: forwarded 1055228 https://sourceforge.net/p/plplot/bugs/206/
Control: merge -1 1055228
* Emanuele Rocca [2023-11-16 09:30]:
To be honest I think it's safe to close 1055750 (gfortran) and mark
1055228 (plplot) as forwarded upstream though, I don't think we
ons of bug #1055750 to the same values
previously set
> forwarded 1055228 https://sourceforge.net/p/plplot/bugs/206/
Bug #1055228 [plplot] plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)
Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#1055228 to the same
value
> merge -1 1055228
Bug #105575
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 plplot
Bug #1055228 [src:plplot] plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)
Bug reassigned from package 'src:plplot' to 'plplot'.
No longer marked as found in versions plplot/5.15.0+dfsg2-6.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1055
Hi!
On 2023-11-09 05:11, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> The Fortran example x09f.f90, which is exercised during the building of
> plplot, now fails on armhf, due to the use of the compiler option
> -fstack-clash-protection.
The problem seems unrelated to stach-clash-protection I think, enabling
the
* Rafael Laboissière [2023-11-09 17:11]:
[snip]
There may be a programming error in x09f.f90 or this may be a problem
with gfortran on armhf. My knowledge of Fortran is almost non existent
and I will need the help of experts, in order to fix the issue.
Regarding this issue, I filed a bug
Control: tags -1 + confirmed help
* Gianfranco Costamagna [2023-11-02 15:09]:
Source: plplot
Version: 5.15.0+dfsg2-6
Severity: serious
Hello, I found the package FTBFS on Ubuntu, checked on amdahl and found the
same issue.
/usr/bin/make -f examples/fortran/CMakeFiles/x31f.dir/build.make
Source: plplot
Version: 5.15.0+dfsg2-6
Severity: serious
Hello, I found the package FTBFS on Ubuntu, checked on amdahl and found the
same issue.
/usr/bin/make -f examples/fortran/CMakeFiles/x31f.dir/build.make
examples/fortran/CMakeFiles/x31f.dir/build
make[5]: Entering directory
12 matches
Mail list logo
