Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham On 30 November 2023 at 07:54, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi Dirk | | On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 00:51, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Ping squared. | > | > If I don't hear from you I may just close this. I believe this (non-, to me) | > issue has been taken care of. If you think I am wrong

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-30 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Dirk On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 00:51, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Ping squared. > > If I don't hear from you I may just close this. I believe this (non-, to me) > issue has been taken care of. If you think I am wrong please let me know. I closed it on 2023-11-24 [1]. Where do you see it still

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 27 November 2023 at 08:27, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | Graham, | | Quick ping to ask where we are we on this? Matrix is in testing so can this | be closed? Ping squared. If I don't hear from you I may just close this. I believe this (non-, to me) issue has been taken care of. If you

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-27 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Graham, Quick ping to ask where we are we on this? Matrix is in testing so can this be closed? Cheers, Dirk -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 06:20:01PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs: > I think this means at least r-cran-seuratobject (not r-cran-seurat > itself) is also in need of your fix [1], if only to silence that > warning. Would you please take care of that? Done. Thanks for checking

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-21 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Andreas On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 13:07, Andreas Tille wrote: > Since I have no idea what the failures in r-cran-seurat test > log[6] mean I would prefer to wait until we can upload the latest > version. > > > [6] https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-cran-seurat/unstable/amd64/40043272/ I had a

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 12:21:39PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs: > For the r-cran-tmb upload, I now see only autopkgtest regressions [1] for: > r-cran-insight/0.19.6+dfsg-1 > r-cran-parameters/0.21.2-1 > I have not investigated, but these seem to be passing in unstable, so > can be

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-20 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham, On 20 November 2023 at 12:13, Graham Inggs wrote: | On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > So it contains a patch by Mikael which had been applied _permitting Matrix | > 1.6-2_ to get to CRAN. So for this particular pair it was the other way around. | | Great,

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Andreas On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 06:59, Andreas Tille wrote: > > We liked the change you made to r-cran-tmb [2], as this allows the > > affected packages to be binNMU'd and gain a versioned dependency on > > r-cran-matrix. Would you please apply this to the other affected > > packages (only

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Dirk On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > So it contains a patch by Mikael which had been applied _permitting Matrix > 1.6-2_ to get to CRAN. So for this particular pair it was the other way > around. Great, thanks for clearing that up. > So I leave this in your hands.

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 01:55:04PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs: > On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 at 19:18, Andreas Tille wrote: > > We need some means to follow ABI changes. In Debian we could use > > something like r-matrix-abi-VERSION. > > Indeed, this is one solution. As you saw in [1],

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-19 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 19 November 2023 at 09:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | On 19 November 2023 at 13:49, Graham Inggs wrote: | | We don't believe only touching debian/changelog, or a binNMU, is | | sufficient. We were surprised that your r-cran-lme4 upload did not at | | least include: | | Depends: r-cran-matrix

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-19 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham, On 19 November 2023 at 13:49, Graham Inggs wrote: | On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 12:42, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Doesn't 'normal' do that? | | No, only serious and above are considered RC [1] and also for migration. | | This week, Paul Gevers and I spent some time discussing ways to

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-19 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Andreas On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 at 19:18, Andreas Tille wrote: > We need some means to follow ABI changes. In Debian we could use > something like r-matrix-abi-VERSION. Indeed, this is one solution. As you saw in [1], upstream now provide an ABI version and a way to extract it: > Matrix will

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-19 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Dirk On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 12:42, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Doesn't 'normal' do that? No, only serious and above are considered RC [1] and also for migration. This week, Paul Gevers and I spent some time discussing ways to move this transition forward. Referring back to some of your

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
I will not engage any more with debian-r. But this is now at the BTS so a clarification may be in order. This started as I had sent an email as a heads-up to fellow maintainers (via that mostly pointless list) informing them that their packages would exhibit a bug following a bug in package

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:52:29PM -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > | Anyway. Now that you made it a bug I let you drive this. Upstream just made > | an unrelated bugfix Matrix 1.6-3 which I just sent to unstable. > > There are two known failures left which the maintainer(s) do not want to

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-17 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 14 November 2023 at 07:42, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 14 November 2023 at 12:26, Graham Inggs wrote: | | Hi Dirk | | | | On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 12:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > Well that seems to be a) the wrong severity and b) the wrong package. | | | | Both are correct. We do

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-14 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 14 November 2023 at 12:26, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi Dirk | | On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 12:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Well that seems to be a) the wrong severity and b) the wrong package. | | Both are correct. We do not want rmatrix to migrate and break | packages in testing. Doesn't

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-14 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Dirk On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 12:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Well that seems to be a) the wrong severity and b) the wrong package. Both are correct. We do not want rmatrix to migrate and break packages in testing. However, in this case, I only set the severity to match reality; rmatrix is

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-14 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 14 November 2023 at 09:15, Graham Inggs wrote: | Source: rmatrix | Version: 1.6-2-1 | Severity: serious | X-Debbugs-Cc: debia...@lists.debian.org | | Hi Dirk | | I'm opening this bug as a place for discussion and to track the | affected packages. It can be closed once rmatrix and its |

Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2

2023-11-14 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: rmatrix Version: 1.6-2-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: debia...@lists.debian.org Hi Dirk I'm opening this bug as a place for discussion and to track the affected packages. It can be closed once rmatrix and its reverse-dependencies are ready to migrate. I've copied your email to the