Hi,
Am 12.01.24 um 17:56 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
experimental, the configure script does detect the absence of the
xmlNanoFTPNewCtxt function in the libxml2 library (version
2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1) and disables the call to the xmlNanoFTP* functions.
* Thorsten Glaser [2024-01-12 17:56]:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
experimental, the configure script does detect the absence of the
xmlNanoFTPNewCtxt function in the libxml2 library (version
2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1) and disables the call to the xmlNanoFTP* functions.
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> experimental, the configure script does detect the absence of the
> xmlNanoFTPNewCtxt function in the libxml2 library (version
> 2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1) and disables the call to the xmlNanoFTP* functions.
> However, this rebuilt will not be
Rafael
* Rene Engelhard [2023-12-25 23:48]:
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 22:57 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
I didn't file it for the plain build issue. Nevertheless, if it
broke so many projects you probably should do a full-fledged rebuild
and send
Well, mitigated by 2.12.3, but still.
But again,
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 22:57 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
I didn't file it for the plain build issue. Nevertheless, if it broke so
many projects you probably should do a full-fledged rebuild and send
Well, mitigated by 2.12.3, but still.
But again, this is completely off-topic to what I filed in
On Mon, 25 Dec 2023, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> In any case, *this* bug is about the ABI change: removed symbols/versions
> other
> stuff relies on.
>
> Long story short: libxml2 2.12 has still a long road to go with much work on
> your side until you can upload it to unstable.
Sounds like it
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 22:33 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
The tests are still failing and there is no patch anywhere yet, see
Sorry, link got lost:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158423
and c) you ignore the actual issue here at hand and that is that the new
libxml2 breaks the
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 16:31 schrieb Aron Xu:
Hi Rene,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 3:39 AM Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:03:56PM +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
"... but doesn't yet succeed the tests with 2.12"
Hi Rene,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 3:39 AM Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:03:56PM +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
>
> "... but doesn't yet succeed the tests with 2.12"
>
> >
Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:03:56PM +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
"... but doesn't yet succeed the tests with 2.12"
> S=/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/libreoffice-24-2 && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir
> && /usr/bin/ccache
Package: libxml2
Version: 2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
Hi,
LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
But that is not the point of this issue.
While test building current 24.2 snapshot which will become 24.2 rc1
later this week I get
[build
11 matches
Mail list logo
