Your message dated Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:52:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in a really old NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2004 10:48:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 19 02:48:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.189] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Cfybk-0000jL-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 02:48:12 -0800
Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
        by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
        id 1Cfybj-0007nO-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:48:11 +0100
Received: from [217.86.224.161] (helo=bougon.org)
        by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
        id 1Cfybj-0008PS-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:48:11 +0100
Received: by bougon.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
        id D1FF020407; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:48:09 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Cheramy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux-wlan-ng: modules must be recompiled against new 2.4.27 kernel
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:48:09 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
auth:4787efcd892fae3836a59691305cfa00
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: linux-wlan-ng
Version: 0.2.0+0.2.1pre21-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

with the new package package kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386 version 2.4.27-6,
kernel symbols changed [1].

While our kernel packagers discuss the best way to solve this,
linux-wlan-ng does not work anymore. The modules should be recompiled.

For people who can't wait for the official package (I can imagine
Bradley wants to wait that the kernel situation is stabilised), here is
an apt-link to my personal package (recompile + correct wep key
translation). Please note I (lazily) made package version+1, so you'll
probably have to switch manually back to debian version when Bradley
produces the official modules.

deb http://robert.cheramy.net/debian linux-wlan-ng/
deb-src http://robert.cheramy.net/debian linux-wlan-ng/

Cheers,

tibob

Notes
1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284356 )


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.iso88591)

Versions of packages linux-wlan-ng depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  sysvinit                    2.86-5       System-V like init
ii  wireless-tools              27-1         Tools for manipulating Linux Wirel

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 286305-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 15:52:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 07:52:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host82-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it 
(host85-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it) [80.180.126.82] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EYQLI-0007Kd-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 07:52:33 -0800
Received: from garfield.casa-tassi ([192.168.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
        by host85-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
        id 1EYQQT-0007G7-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:57:53 +0100
Received: from tassi by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EYQKn-0006CL-7k
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:52:01 +0100
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:52:01 +0100
From: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in a really old NMU
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

fixed one year ago in NMU
-- 
Enrico Tassi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to