Hello,
RE: Debian bug #299223 [0]; is this possibly a duplicate of #283721? I
had originall reassigned to iptables, then thought better of it, now
I'm not sure. Without more information, I can't tell, but I thought
you might have better instinct than I.
Thanks,
Justin
References
[0]
Hi,
You recently reported a bug [0] against Debian's pacakge of
webmin-firewall. Could you report which version of iptables you have
installed?
Thanks,
Justin
References
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=278916
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2005, 11:01 -0500 schrieb Justin Pryzby:
Hi,
You recently reported a bug [0] against Debian's pacakge of
webmin-firewall. Could you report which version of iptables you have
installed?
I am using version 1.2.11-8 (Debian sarge system)
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 299223 iptables
Bug#299223: webmin-firewall: not functional module
Bug reassigned from package `webmin-firewall' to `iptables'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
reassign 299223 iptables
thanks
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 05:43:11PM +0100, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 13.03.2005, 11:01 -0500 schrieb Justin Pryzby:
Hi,
You recently reported a bug [0] against Debian's pacakge of
webmin-firewall. Could you report which version of iptables you
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:51:48AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
reassign 299223 iptables
why?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 06:55:30PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:51:48AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
reassign 299223 iptables
why?
Because I originally thought it looked like the grave iptables bug
(tagged woody), but when I reread it with the reporter's iptables
7 matches
Mail list logo
