Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nec: FTBFS: couldn't open the intermediate file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2005 16:35:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 08 09:35:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DUokA-0004L5-00; Sun, 08 May 2005 09:35:02 -0700
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
        by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A41AB487;
        Sun,  8 May 2005 18:35:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-11-105.mnet-online.de 
[82.135.11.105])
        by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFC990E48;
        Sun,  8 May 2005 18:34:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5381E100442A3;
        Sun,  8 May 2005 18:34:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nec: FTBFS: couldn't open the intermediate file
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun,  8 May 2005 18:34:55 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: nec
Version: 2-9
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge

Hi,

building the package nec in a clean sarge build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:

=========================================================================
[...]
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/nec-2'
rm -f `find . -name "*~"`
rm -rf debian/tmp `find debian/* -type d ! -name CVS ` debian/files* core
rm -f debian/*substvars
 dpkg-source -b nec-2
dpkg-source: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using 
uid of process (1001)
dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; 
using uid of process (1001)
debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of 
process (1001)
dpkg-source: building nec using existing nec_2.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: building nec in nec_2-9.diff.gz
dpkg-source: building nec in nec_2-9.dsc
 debian/rules build
test -f debian/rules
/usr/bin/make FC=fort77 F77=fort77
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/nec-2'
for subdir in somnec nec; do \
  (cd $subdir && /usr/bin/make  all) || exit 1; \
        done
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/nec-2/somnec'
fort77 -O2  -c -o somnec.o somnec.f
   MAIN somnec:
Warning on line 19: non-character datum lcomp initialized with character string
Compiler error line 202 of : start_formatting:  couldn't open the intermediate 
file

/usr/bin/fort77: aborting compilation
make[2]: *** [somnec.o] Error 25
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/nec-2/somnec'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/nec-2'
make: *** [build] Error 2
=========================================================================

Thanks for considering.


--
DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite
http://darts.alioth.debian.org/

Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically.
DARTS just helped finding the problem.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308181-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 00:34:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 17:34:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DW1ee-0006U2-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 17:34:21 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j4C0YIPW029144
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:18 +0200
Received: from mail.irb.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
        by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j4C0YGXV029133
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:16 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j4C0YGrS029132
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:16 +0200
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:16 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: nec: FTBFS: couldn't open the intermediate file
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at irb.hr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 06:34:55PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> building the package nec in a clean sarge build environment
> (with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
[...]
> Compiler error line 202 of : start_formatting:  couldn't open the 
> intermediate file
[...]

This was caused by a problem in f2c (Bug#292792), which is now fixed.

Thanks!

Matej


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to