Hi,
has anyone thought of having a look how other distributions solved this
problem? I am pretty sure some might already have solved that problem.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Release Team Member
Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 311812 grave
Bug#311812: postfix: syslog reconnection
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
#rationale: data loss
tags 311812 + etch lenny sid
Bug#311812: postfix: syslog reconnection
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch, lenny, sid
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 12:01:57AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
This bug introduce a serious risk of loosing important log data, which
is - especially for a MTA - not acceptable. Asking people to restart
postfix after reloading syslog is a *stupid* workaround, which also
results in the loss of
severity 311812 important
--
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 04:17:12PM +, Alexander Wirt wrote:
severity 311812 grave
It's only grave if the bug is against syslogd. Syslogd doesn't provide
a method for postfix to change the config file, and therefore it would
be a policy violation for postfix to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 311812 important
Bug#311812: postfix: syslog reconnection
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
5 matches
Mail list logo
