Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325952: fixed in rezound 0.12.2beta-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2005 21:38:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 31 14:38:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.201] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EAaHo-0004uN-00; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:38:24 -0700
Received: (qmail 52172 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2005 21:37:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.216.211 
with login)
  by smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 21:37:54 -0000
Received: by triplehelix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 12AEC2A95DA; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: rezound
Severity: serious

Hello,

If you're receiving this message, you have a package that depends on one
of the FLAC libraries (libFLAC, libFLAC++, libOggFLAC, libOggFLAC++.)
Once again, the SONAME of the libraries has increased due to an API
transition and you must rebuild your packages.

Please briefly review the upstream API changelog at:

http://flac.sourceforge.net/changelog.html

to check if any of the API changes affect your FLAC-depending package.
In most cases, a simple rebuild will be sufficient to transition. If you
like, you can version the libflac-dev, libflac++-dev, liboggflac-dev,
or liboggflac++-dev build-dependency to (>= 1.1.2-1) to ensure that your
package is autobuilt against the new versions of the libraries.

Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the transition.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and thank you.

-- 
Joshua Kwan

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 325952-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 13:18:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 06:18:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EFX8M-0003Uy-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
From: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325952: fixed in rezound 0.12.2beta-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: rezound
Source-Version: 0.12.2beta-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rezound, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rezound_0.12.2beta-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rezound/rezound_0.12.2beta-1.diff.gz
rezound_0.12.2beta-1.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rezound/rezound_0.12.2beta-1.dsc
rezound_0.12.2beta-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rezound/rezound_0.12.2beta-1_i386.deb
rezound_0.12.2beta.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/r/rezound/rezound_0.12.2beta.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rezound 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:57:13 +0200
Source: rezound
Binary: rezound
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.12.2beta-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 rezound    - Audio file editor
Closes: 325209 325952 328153
Changes: 
 rezound (0.12.2beta-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Fixed 64 bit problems, thanks to Andreas Jochens (closes: #325209)
   * recompile against new flac (closes: #325952)
   * libxmesa-dev build dependency changed to libxmesa-gl-dev (closes: #328153)
Files: 
 88a563a2961659cca66d7bc7521870e1 1015 sound optional rezound_0.12.2beta-1.dsc
 40b4c4bdef4bf9c39264d4c49a730530 1727116 sound optional 
rezound_0.12.2beta.orig.tar.gz
 c68e84a410ba085b48a11295a1ad09e7 9247 sound optional 
rezound_0.12.2beta-1.diff.gz
 e41cb14577d6939c68b400a960475fe4 1585908 sound optional 
rezound_0.12.2beta-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDKCBp1pbKhmC2uVgRAk//AJ9LWH0nDvdfd9MRmWUebIVD502BHwCgksFS
WquVVzpXbW3oX5MRkJfED34=
=rxLB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to