Bug#328200: [debian-ntp] Bug#328200: Problems with ntp

2005-09-15 Thread Bob Proulx
Matthew Garrett wrote: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are several files that are BSD with advertising clause, including libntp/memmove.c, libntp/mktime.c, libntp/random.c, libntp/strerror.c, libntp/strstr.c, ntpd/refclock_jupiter.c, and ntpd/refclock_mx4200.c. These should be

Bug#328200: [debian-ntp] Bug#328200: Problems with ntp

2005-09-14 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Matthijs, I've never tested openntpd, but it is the obvious replacement in case of legal problems with ntp and it has been released with sarge. I use openntpd and that works better then ntp IMHO. Last time i checked, - it doesn't support attached clocks, so no stratum 1 - it only seems

Bug#328200: [debian-ntp] Bug#328200: Problems with ntp

2005-09-14 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 00:03 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: The maintainers should have a chance to clear up this question first. I'll have a look at it today. Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328200: [debian-ntp] Bug#328200: Problems with ntp

2005-09-14 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 00:03 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: The maintainers should have a chance to clear up this question first. Ok, I've just been through the ntp source tree looking at all the copyright and license assertions. Executive summary is that there are indeed some problems, but it's

Bug#328200: [debian-ntp] Bug#328200: Problems with ntp

2005-09-14 Thread Matthew Garrett
Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The file util/ansi2knr.c is also GPL. I'm pretty sure it's unused, but an easy reference in debian/copyright would cover it. This may be a problem if it is used, as: There are several files that are BSD with advertising clause, including