Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-16 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:42:54PM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote: On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 06:15:04PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I would really like to have the choice of both approaches, also for less common tasks like switching from 2.4 or preparing an alien bootup (either for

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:53:41PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: That said, I also think I should be able to implement those options to the mkinitrd.yaird wrapper - if upstream doesn't beat me to it ;-). Is that an

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:57:31 +0200 Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch claims support for 2.6.8, which is where development started, but later yaird versions only have had testing with newer kernels. If we could get away with

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [responding only to the bugreport, not d-k] On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:57:31 +0200 Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, i didn't know the mkinitrd wrapper was shell, or i would have done it myself. I wonder why you need the : if [

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:34:57PM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote: On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:57:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:53:41PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Hey, i didn't know

Bug#333858: initrd/initramfs: we discussed enough, let's take some action now :)

2005-10-15 Thread Erik van Konijnenburg
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 06:15:04PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:34:57 +0200 Erik van Konijnenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:57:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote: On