Bug#397908: syscall workaround

2006-11-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
Yup, the syscall workaround looks sane enough from here. I'm amazed that this kind of thing is necessary - libc calls should be enough for user-space packages to use... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] You raise the blade, you make the change...

Bug#397908: syscall workaround

2006-11-12 Thread Daigo Moriwaki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Yauheni, Yauheni Kaliuta wrote: _syscalln macroses defined only for __KERNEL__ in unistd.h. A workaround like for i386 helps to build it, but I do not know how it is correct. The code has been taken from unistd.h I found that google-perftools

Bug#397908: syscall workaround

2006-11-11 Thread Yauheni Kaliuta
_syscalln macroses defined only for __KERNEL__ in unistd.h. A workaround like for i386 helps to build it, but I do not know how it is correct. The code has been taken from unistd.h diff --git a/src/base/linux_syscall_support.h b/src/base/linux_syscall_support.h index 0dfdd8d..41b3b17 100644 ---