On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 07:41:10PM +, Joe Nahmias wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 11:57:55PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
Lets not complicate this matter with the age-long build/build-arch
discussion. libtommath needs add the build-dependencies enough to
to get through debian/rules build
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 05:49:23AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 19:41:10 +, Joe Nahmias wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't understand why the build target
is called in the first place. Can't you just run debian/rules
binary-arch -- which is mandated by
Hi Riku,
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 02:48:53PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 07:41:10PM +, Joe Nahmias wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 11:57:55PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
Lets not complicate this matter with the age-long build/build-arch
discussion. libtommath needs
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 11:57:55PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
Lets not complicate this matter with the age-long build/build-arch
discussion. libtommath needs add the build-dependencies enough to
to get through debian/rules build for the time being.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't
Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 11:57:55PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
Lets not complicate this matter with the age-long build/build-arch
discussion. libtommath needs add the build-dependencies enough to
to get through debian/rules build for the time being.
Maybe
Hi Roger,
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:36:37PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Joe Nahmias [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
I discussed this yesterday on #debian-devel. The main issues are
Sorry I missed it, had I known I would've liked to participate.
- it's not possible to robustly determine if
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 19:41:10 +, Joe Nahmias wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't understand why the build target
is called in the first place. Can't you just run debian/rules
binary-arch -- which is mandated by policy -- and everything will be ok
because of the target
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 478524 -1
Bug#478524: debian/rules build target requires installing B-D-I
Bug 478524 cloned as bug 479556.
retitle -1 dpkg-buildpackage does not call build-indep or build-arch targets
if present
Bug#479556: debian/rules build target requires
clone 478524 -1
retitle -1 dpkg-buildpackage does not call build-indep or build-arch targets if
present
severity -1 wishlist
merge 398625 -1
blocks 474413 by -1
thanks
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 03:10:32PM +, Joe Nahmias wrote:
Well, I made the change and now calling binary-arch target of
Lets not complicate this matter with the age-long build/build-arch
discussion. libtommath needs add the build-dependencies enough to
to get through debian/rules build for the time being.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
clone 474413 -1
retitle -1 debian/rules build target requires installing B-D-I
reassign -1 sbuild
blocks 474413 by -1
thanks
Hello,
Well, I made the change and now calling binary-arch target of
debian/rules no longer runs latex.
However, as you can see on line 156 of
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 03:10:32PM +, Joe Nahmias wrote:
Well, I made the change and now calling binary-arch target of
debian/rules no longer runs latex.
build-arch is not implemented by dpkg. The policy just don't reflect the
reality.
Bastian
--
Totally illogical, there was no chance.
12 matches
Mail list logo
