PYGTK problem solved, please CLOSE the ticket. -SD ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sedat Dilek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 18.04.2008 00:40 Subject: Re: [ephy-webkitgtk] BUG#476229: pygtk-2.0: pkgconfig path set wrong To: Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The PYGTK problem concerning ephy-webkit is solved with python2.5_2.5.2-3 and python-defaults_2.5.2-1. I got the files from <incoming.debian-ports.org> to build the Debian packages. -SD $ grep -i pygtk config.log configure:27311: checking for PYGTK configure:27319: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "pygtk-2.0 >= $PYGTK_REQUIRED gnome-python-2.0 >= $GNOME_PYTHON_REQUIRED" configure:27337: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "pygtk-2.0 >= $PYGTK_REQUIRED gnome-python-2.0 >= $GNOME_PYTHON_REQUIRED" configure:27386: checking for pygtk defs configure:27389: result: /usr/share/pygtk/2.0/defs configure:27392: checking for pygtk codegen configure:27395: result: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/pygtk/2.0/codegen/codegen.py configure:27398: checking for pygtk h2def configure:27401: result: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/pygtk/2.0/codegen/h2def.py ac_cv_env_PYGTK_CFLAGS_set= ac_cv_env_PYGTK_CFLAGS_value= ac_cv_env_PYGTK_LIBS_set= ac_cv_env_PYGTK_LIBS_value= pkg_cv_PYGTK_CFLAGS='-I/usr/include/pygtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gnome-python-2.0 ' pkg_cv_PYGTK_LIBS='-lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 ' PYGTK_CFLAGS='-I/usr/include/pygtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gnome-python-2.0 ' PYGTK_CODEGEN='/usr/bin/python /usr/share/pygtk/2.0/codegen/codegen.py' PYGTK_DEFSDIR='/usr/share/pygtk/2.0/defs' PYGTK_H2DEF='/usr/bin/python /usr/share/pygtk/2.0/codegen/h2def.py' PYGTK_LIBS='-lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 ' 2008/4/17, Sedat Dilek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > python-defaults-2.5.2-0.2-nmu.diff does NOT fix the PyGTK problem. > -SD > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476229#58 > > 2008/4/17, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > > please do NOT misunderstand me: It was just a feedback, not the > > request that > > > you should do the work or put in the mailing-list. > > > Sorry to have misused plenty of your time. > > > > > > Don't misunderstand me either, that's fine; I'm just telling out loud > > that I can't work on it right now; it's very urgent though > > > > Thanks for mentionning the bug hit you too; I escalated its priority > > back then > > > > > > > I love to get in touch with human-beings directly, mailing-list are so > > > un-personal... > > > > > > Eh, agreed > > > > > > /me returns to work > > > > -- > > > > Loïc Minier > > > > >
