On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:31:24PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 11/10/08 at 22:34 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: [...]
Please note that I have almost no experience with SQL stuff. This
is just the basic idea and needs real improvements. (Would be a good
QA test, in my opinion).
[...]
On 11/10/08 at 22:34 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 05:30:10PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 28/09/08 at 15:06 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 28 September 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Isn't this a bug of our upgrading tools, that should prefer to install
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 05:30:10PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 28/09/08 at 15:06 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 28 September 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Isn't this a bug of our upgrading tools, that should prefer to install
a new, non-obsolete package A that Provides: B, rather than
On 28/09/08 at 15:06 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 28 September 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Isn't this a bug of our upgrading tools, that should prefer to install
a new, non-obsolete package A that Provides: B, rather than keeping a
no-longer-present-in-the-lists B installed?
On Sunday 28 September 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Frans, did you just run into this bug by luck, or did you specifically
looked for such cases?
I'd say by accident rather than luck :-P
But I certainly did not go looking for it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 01:19:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Package: libdb-ruby1.8
Version: 0.6.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Causes unclean upgrades
I have dhelp installed on a Lenny system, which depends on
libdb4.2-ruby1.8. After upgrading the system at some point I was left
with
6 matches
Mail list logo
