* Tony Houghton [100110 14:30 +0000] > I can't build the test version against 2.6.32 either, build log > attached. > > I think there must be a good reason why the kernel deb maintainers added > their patches and that if you want to maintain a module package you need > to be able to work with their patches.
checking for kernel linux/config.h... no Creating <linux/config.h>... checking for deprecated linux/config.h... checking to modify of kernel linux/kmod.h... yes cat: /lib/modules/2.6.32-trunk-amd64/build/include/linux/kmod.h: No such file or directory checking for kernel linux/utsrelease.h... yes checking for kernel linux/compiler.h... no Creating a dummy <linux/compiler.h>... checking for kernel linux/pm.h... no Creating a dummy <linux/pm.h>... ...... You're missing headers! That is not alsa's fault. The last Debian kernel where the headers are correct is 2.6.30, though. $ apt-file search linux/kmod.h linux-headers-2.6.30-1-common: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.30-1-common/include/linux/kmod.h > I wish I could help but I don't > think I have time to do the research right now :-(. > > If alsa 1.0.21 is the same as in kernel 2.6.32 I suppose it's no great > loss, but I was hoping to find a workaround for #564587. 2.6.32 includes alsa-1.0.21 Elimar -- Never make anything simple and efficient when a way can be found to make it complex and wonderful ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org