Bug#556526: hurd - FHS violation: /libexec
Philipp Kern, le Wed 07 Sep 2011 11:07:31 +0200, a écrit : Package: hurd Version: 20090404-2 Severity: important Hurd violates the FHS by using /libexec. This name seems to be only used by init and /etc/ttys. It shouldn't be too hard to move from /libexec, there's currently console-run getty rc @runsystem runsystem.gnu runttys getty could go into /sbin/getty (util-linux does not ship it), console-run and runttys probably, too. rc could go to /etc/hurd/rc, as well as runsystem? Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#556526: hurd - FHS violation: /libexec
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Hurd violates the FHS by using /libexec. This name seems to be only used by init and /etc/ttys. I'm upgrading this to serious on the grounds that this package is only useful on the non-release architecture hurd-i386 and it's clearly a policy violation that makes the package unsuitable for a release. There's a patch here: http://lists.archhurd.org/devel/msg00102.html. The patch moves /libexec/* to /etc. I guess /sbin (or maybe, /lib/hurd) would be more appropriate. What do you think? -- Jérémie Koenig j...@jk.fr.eu.org http://jk.fr.eu.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#556526: hurd - FHS violation: /libexec
Jérémie Koenig j...@jk.fr.eu.org writes: On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Hurd violates the FHS by using /libexec. This name seems to be only used by init and /etc/ttys. I'm upgrading this to serious on the grounds that this package is only useful on the non-release architecture hurd-i386 and it's clearly a policy violation that makes the package unsuitable for a release. There's a patch here: http://lists.archhurd.org/devel/msg00102.html. The patch moves /libexec/* to /etc. I guess /sbin (or maybe, /lib/hurd) would be more appropriate. What do you think? With my occassional Hurd user hat on, /lib/hurd sounds like the most appropriate place to put these stuff into, or failing that, /sbin. But definitely not /etc. Neither init, nor console-run strike me as things the user would wish to edit. -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#556526: hurd - FHS violation: /libexec
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 556526 serious Bug #556526 [hurd] hurd - FHS violation: /libexec Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 556526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556526 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
