Raphael Geissert atom...@gmail.com writes:
I think it is fair to say that it is ok to remove a local diversion if
the user is saying that she/he wants dash to be /bin/sh. Not doing so
would even leave the diversion and debconf db in an inconsistent state.
So, Russ, do you agree that
On 28 April 2010 21:13, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Raphael Geissert atom...@gmail.com writes:
I think it is fair to say that it is ok to remove a local diversion if
the user is saying that she/he wants dash to be /bin/sh. Not doing so
would even leave the diversion and debconf db in
Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org writes:
One possible solution I can think about is to ignore/bypass the
package-uses-local-diversion check for now and later handle the issue
when bash is the one that has to divert /bin/sh.
I think it would be reasonable to just bail if a local diversion
3 matches
Mail list logo
