Bug#596751: not suitable for squeeze

2012-05-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Jon, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (19/02/2012): Hi! Uli Martens u...@youam.net (02/12/2011): By now squeeze is released but this bug is still open. You updated the package 66 days ago last, so i'm wondering if debgtd should be either removed or this bug should be closed.

Bug#596751: not suitable for squeeze

2012-05-25 Thread Jon Dowland
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 09:59:45AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: could you please take 5 seconds to answer this, please? Hi Cyril, Sorry yes. (I wish I had a better bug workflow. Stuff like this keeps getting lost. Kind of ironic given the package.) OK being realistic, I haven't devoted any

Bug#596751: not suitable for squeeze

2012-05-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Jon Dowland j...@debian.org (25/05/2012): Sorry yes. (I wish I had a better bug workflow. Stuff like this keeps getting lost. Kind of ironic given the package.) :D I think the odds are that we should remove it from Debian. The package is not without merit, popcon says ~40 submitters

Bug#596751: not suitable for squeeze

2012-02-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi! Uli Martens u...@youam.net (02/12/2011): By now squeeze is released but this bug is still open. You updated the package 66 days ago last, so i'm wondering if debgtd should be either removed or this bug should be closed. Long story short: ping. :) greetings, youam (at the BSP

Bug#596751: not suitable for squeeze

2011-12-02 Thread Uli Martens
Hello Jon, On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:52:59PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: I do not think debgtd is currently useful enough to warrant a place in a stable release. I have not spent time on it in a while and perhaps should consider removing it altogether - however, for the time being, I just

Bug#596751: not suitable for squeeze

2010-09-13 Thread Jon Dowland
Package: debgtd Version: 1.3.1-1 Severity: serious I do not think debgtd is currently useful enough to warrant a place in a stable release. I have not spent time on it in a while and perhaps should consider removing it altogether - however, for the time being, I just want to block it from being