severity 607267 important
thanks
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 02:33:00PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
FWIW this is unreproducible as of kernel 3.2 rc2 so I guess this is
squeeze only for cifs shares (as can be verified by running the test on
a squeeze live CD).
Thanks for reporting. Given the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 607267 important
Bug #607267 [openssh-client] /usr/bin/scp: fails to notice close() errors
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
607267:
FWIW this is unreproducible as of kernel 3.2 rc2 so I guess this is
squeeze only for cifs shares (as can be verified by running the test on
a squeeze live CD).
If there are other filesystems that might produce the same behaviour
under some circumstances in current kernel I don't know.
However,
Hi Michal,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 12:41:21AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Excerpts from Helmut Grohne's message of Sat Dec 03 17:33:04 +0100 2011:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 03:48:05PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
This same issue also happens with cp(1) from coreutils.
I
Excerpts from Helmut Grohne's message of Mon Dec 05 15:54:19 +0100 2011:
Hi Michal,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 12:41:21AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Excerpts from Helmut Grohne's message of Sat Dec 03 17:33:04 +0100 2011:
is not clear what this issue is.
Please read the analysis in the
Hi Michal,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 05:03:25PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Excerpts from Helmut Grohne's message of Mon Dec 05 15:54:19 +0100 2011:
Can we now ignore 2) and concentrate on 1)?
No. If I wanted this semantics I could use shred(1).
Please report a separate bug about not using
Excerpts from Helmut Grohne's message of Mon Dec 05 18:15:53 +0100 2011:
Hi Michal,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 05:03:25PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Excerpts from Helmut Grohne's message of Mon Dec 05 15:54:19 +0100 2011:
Can we now ignore 2) and concentrate on 1)?
No. If I wanted
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 19:57:59 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
I would guess that most of the rest of the world is not aware of this
issue.
Please kindly take me off your nonsense rants. And better yet, take
them off the debian bug tracking system.
TIA,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Excerpts from Helmut Grohne's message of Sat Dec 03 17:33:04 +0100 2011:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 03:48:05PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
This same issue also happens with cp(1) from coreutils.
I verified that this statement is wrong.
It is not.
1) The coreutils actually check
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 03:48:05PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
This same issue also happens with cp(1) from coreutils.
I verified that this statement is wrong.
1) The coreutils actually check the return value of close which can be
seen on copy.c. It has precisely two calls to close and
Hello
Excerpts from Julien Cristau's message of Sat Dec 25 22:00:11 +0100 2010:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 607267 squeeze-can-defer
tag 607267 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 13:40:30 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Package: openssh-client
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 607267 squeeze-can-defer
tag 607267 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 13:40:30 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Package: openssh-client
Version: 1:5.5p1-5+b1
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/scp
Justification: causes non-serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
usertag 607267 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#607267: /usr/bin/scp: fails to notice close() errors
There were no usertags set
Package: openssh-client
Version: 1:5.5p1-5+b1
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/scp
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
scp fails to notice close() errors.
To reproduce:
- mount a 10M tmpfs
- export it through samba
- mount the share through cifs
- take a 12M file (eg dd from
14 matches
Mail list logo