reopen 608655
kthxbye
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 20:32:32 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hello,
Apologies for the oversight when renaming these binaries for the last
upload.
I think the scotch user base will expect the standard name of the gbase
binary. So there are a couple of options:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 608655
Bug #608655 {Done: hazel...@debian.org (Adam C. Powell, IV)} [scotch] scotch
and gbase: error when trying to install together
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to
reassign 608655 scotch 5.1.11.dfsg-1
thanks
Marcos Marado mindboosterno...@gmail.com (04/01/2011):
That said, a fix to this should go to scoth then (and untag this bug
from gbase), and should be something as easy as re-renaming this
particular binary and manpage.
That part sounds sane. Trying
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 608655 scotch 5.1.11.dfsg-1
Bug #608655 [gbase,scotch] scotch and gbase: error when trying to install
together
Bug reassigned from package 'gbase,scotch' to 'scotch'.
Bug #608655 [scotch] scotch and gbase: error when trying to install
Hello,
Apologies for the oversight when renaming these binaries for the last
upload.
I think the scotch user base will expect the standard name of the gbase
binary. So there are a couple of options: conflict with gbase, or
use /etc/alternatives.
Is there a way in popcon to see how many users
Hi there,
On Monday 03 January 2011 21:48:45 Josip Rodin wrote:
The problem is in scotch, that changed all the binary names from
scotch_$binary to just $binary (see [1]).
The gbase in scotch is completely different than the one from the gbase
package. My first idea would be to just
Hi there,
The problem is in scotch, that changed all the binary names from
scotch_$binary to just $binary (see [1]).
The gbase in scotch is completely different than the one from the gbase
package. My first idea would be to just revert the gbase name change on
scotch, but looking at gbase on
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:16:49PM +, Marcos Marado wrote:
Hi there,
The problem is in scotch, that changed all the binary names from
scotch_$binary to just $binary (see [1]).
The gbase in scotch is completely different than the one from the gbase
package. My first idea would be to
Package: gbase,scotch
Version: gbase/0.5-2.2
Version: scotch/5.1.11.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2011-01-02
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not
9 matches
Mail list logo
