Your message dated Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:19:25 +0000
with message-id <e1rxbyx-0005bp...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#625381: fixed in mach 0.9.1-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #625381,
regarding mach: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
625381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625381
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mach
Version: 0.9.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.6 ftbfs-werror

This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings
which will make the package fail to build.  Currently a Debian patch
just passes
    -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable and
    -Wno-error=unused-but-set-parameter
to avoid build failures, but this patch will be reverted with the
GCC 4.6.1 release, and the severity of the report will be raised.

The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/werror/mach_0.9.1-3_lsid64.buildlog
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: mach
Source-Version: 0.9.1-3.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mach, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

mach_0.9.1-3.1.diff.gz
  to main/m/mach/mach_0.9.1-3.1.diff.gz
mach_0.9.1-3.1.dsc
  to main/m/mach/mach_0.9.1-3.1.dsc
mach_0.9.1-3.1_amd64.deb
  to main/m/mach/mach_0.9.1-3.1_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 625...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <toli...@debian.org> (supplier of updated mach 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:02:51 +0100
Source: mach
Binary: mach
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9.1-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Loïc Minier <l...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <toli...@debian.org>
Description: 
 mach       - make a chroot of a rpm-based distribution
Closes: 625381
Changes: 
 mach (0.9.1-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix FTBFS caused by set, but unused variable with the patch by Peter
     Green (Closes: #625381)
   * Urgency set to medium due to rc bug fix
Checksums-Sha1: 
 d496eea3cdc76b88490bfcaf9d0525527e4386f6 1729 mach_0.9.1-3.1.dsc
 93b70875f2a57d3d2fa02c1fe8bb0649aa31a507 6581 mach_0.9.1-3.1.diff.gz
 142b7a1c65abdb592836b8f441b8b11ba8417092 75006 mach_0.9.1-3.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 9e154421e2a92acfd146dfdf3dba03f644c897e8ebd724220460545ea9d7e5b1 1729 
mach_0.9.1-3.1.dsc
 7ee32b7bbaaca15479b4093ed4d164611106884dfc74d677acd13f1b6bfe3fa8 6581 
mach_0.9.1-3.1.diff.gz
 46a4b2a37ea538aaae80bce99753acaf00050aa3e5b8fd39860ddc34a37c1553 75006 
mach_0.9.1-3.1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 2d6fd7bf1e29e6d28fcbb4e9e5f57ed8 1729 admin optional mach_0.9.1-3.1.dsc
 9af2d982b3c576bf79f466d84a8240a5 6581 admin optional mach_0.9.1-3.1.diff.gz
 61256752761e43709aa04f2fd831a912 75006 admin optional mach_0.9.1-3.1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=J8rL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to