On 09/07/2011 03:18 PM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Hello Thomas,
Just in case, here goes the updated patch.
Cheers,
Stanislav
Hi Stanislav,
Thanks a lot for your patch. I have applied it to the Git and uploaded
it to alioth since I believe it's quite clean now.
I've been quite busy over
On 09/07/2011 03:18 PM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Hello Thomas,
Just in case, here goes the updated patch.
Cheers,
Stanislav
FYI, I just uploaded the patched version. Thanks again for your
contribution, it's much appreciated, especially that I didn't have time
to fix things over the last
Hello Thomas,
Just in case, here goes the updated patch.
Cheers,
Stanislav
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 01:37:23PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 09/05/2011 01:34 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-Replaces: libnatpmp0 (= 20110808-2)
+Replaces: libnatpmp0, libnatpmp1 ( ${binary:Version})
I think
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 01:34:38PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 09/05/2011 06:16 AM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:25:19AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
thanks a lot for your work, but could you provide a git format-patch
type of patch against what's in the Git
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 01:37:23PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Woops, wrote something silly. What we need IMO is:
Package: natpmp-utils
[...]
-Replaces: libnatpmp0 (= 20110808-2)
+Replaces: libnatpmp0, libnatpmp1 (= 20110808-2)
Correct.
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello,
Please consider this NMU (uploaded to mentors.debian.net, see the
forwarded message below).
Changes:
libnatpmp (20110808-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload (Closes: #639084).
* debian/control:
- no need to build-depend/depend on python: python module is not built
Hi again,
Just in case, here goes the diff with all changes to the package.
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Oops, pressed wrong key. Now attached.
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 10:18:11PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Hi again,
Just in case, here goes the diff with all changes to the package.
--
Stanislav
diff -urN a/libnatpmp-20110808/debian/changelog b/libnatpmp-20110808/debian/changelog
---
On 09/05/2011 02:21 AM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Oops, pressed wrong key. Now attached.
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 10:18:11PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Hi again,
Just in case, here goes the diff with all changes to the package.
Hi Stanislav,
thanks a lot for your work, but could
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:25:19AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 09/05/2011 02:21 AM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Oops, pressed wrong key. Now attached.
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 10:18:11PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Hi again,
Just in case, here goes the diff with
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:25:19AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
thanks a lot for your work, but could you provide a git format-patch
type of patch against what's in the Git instead? That'd be really helpful.
Here goes a patch against your current git, please check. I applied my
changes on top
On 09/05/2011 01:34 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-Replaces: libnatpmp0 (= 20110808-2)
+Replaces: libnatpmp0, libnatpmp1 ( ${binary:Version})
I think what I did was right, because after version 20110808-2, we don't
have the upgrade issue.
Woops, wrote something silly. What we need IMO is:
On 09/05/2011 06:16 AM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:25:19AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
thanks a lot for your work, but could you provide a git format-patch
type of patch against what's in the Git instead? That'd be really helpful.
Here goes a patch against your
13 matches
Mail list logo
