Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
Steffen Möller steffen_moel...@gmx.de writes:
Formally speaking there is nothing to argue about. We should remove that
.jar.
To grant us some more time to orchestrate the individuals behind that
package and get up to speed with the much progressed
Steffen Möller steffen_moel...@gmx.de writes:
Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org writes:
You are mixing up GPL and DFSG. GPL says that the source code needs to
be provided at least at request (and it in this case it is pretty easy
to obtain the source code).
The general rule is, if you
Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org writes:
You are mixing up GPL and DFSG. GPL says that the source code needs to
be provided at least at request (and it in this case it is pretty easy
to obtain the source code).
The general rule is, if you distribute binaries, you must distribute
the complete
Hello,
Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org writes:
You are mixing up GPL and DFSG. GPL says that the source code needs to
be provided at least at request (and it in this case it is pretty easy
to obtain the source code).
The general rule is, if you distribute binaries, you must distribute
Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:00:10AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
If you think I have misunderstood the GPL,
You are mixing up GPL and DFSG. GPL says that the source code needs to
be provided at least at request (and it in this case it is pretty easy
to obtain the source code). So
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:00:10AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
If you think I have misunderstood the GPL,
You are mixing up GPL and DFSG. GPL says that the source code needs to
be provided at least at request (and it in this case it is pretty easy
to obtain the
Hello,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:49:55 +0200
Von: Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu
An: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com, 645...@bugs.debian.org
Betreff: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#645487: ensembl: includes GPL code
without source
Hi,
On Sun
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:00:23PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
tags 645487 + pending
quit
Hi,
In October, 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
ensembl's debian/README.source says:
| Since Jalview is not yet part of Debian, its source code is also not
| yet available through or
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:00:23PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Would you be terribly
offended if I requested removal of the current package in the
meantime,
Yes, we would be terribly offended and I explicitely do not want
you to request the removal.
That's a shame.
Le Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:01:44PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
Le Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:00:23PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
This seems to be fixed in the packaging repo. What is left to do
before the updated package is uploaded? Would you be terribly
offended if I requested
tags 645487 + pending
quit
Hi,
In October, 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
ensembl's debian/README.source says:
| Since Jalview is not yet part of Debian, its source code is also not
| yet available through or distribution. To better comply with the GPL,
| the source code of Ensembl also ships
Le Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:00:23PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
This seems to be fixed in the packaging repo. What is left to do
before the updated package is uploaded? Would you be terribly
offended if I requested removal of the current package in the
meantime, so we could continue to
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 09:49:25PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 03:51:18AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Unfortunately no such file exists --- I guess it disappeared during
some upgrade. The jars in the source package only contain class
files, no .java source
Hello Jonathan,
Thank you for spotting the omission.
On 11/30/2011 09:58 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 09:49:25PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 03:51:18AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Unfortunately no such file exists --- I guess it disappeared
Hi Steffen,
could you please answer the more important piece I'm repeating below?
Thanks
Andreas.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:37:11AM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote:
Regarding fixing the actual problem I would like to ask those people
directly involved with ensemble packaging
Hello,
I would not bet on it. Most likely this needs some adjustments to the
Ensembl code since the Jar of Ensembl is considerably older than what is
now in Debian with a much smaller set of dependencies to additional jars.
Please leave it for after the Sprint.
Steffen
On 11/30/2011 10:42 AM,
Source: ensembl
Version: 63-1
Severity: serious
Justification: distributable?
Hi,
ensembl's debian/README.source says:
| Since Jalview is not yet part of Debian, its source code is also not
| yet available through or distribution. To better comply with the GPL,
| the source code of Ensembl also
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 03:51:18AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Unfortunately no such file exists --- I guess it disappeared during
some upgrade. The jars in the source package only contain class
files, no .java source files.
Assuming that what debian/copyright says is correct, this would
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 03:51:18AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Unfortunately no such file exists --- I guess it disappeared during
some upgrade. The jars in the source package only contain class
files, no .java source files.
Assuming that what debian/copyright says
19 matches
Mail list logo
