Bug#656289: Processed: notfixed 656289 in snort/2.9.2-1, notfound 656289 in snort/2.9.2-1

2012-01-29 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Javier (2012.01.28_19:05:26_+0200) Why is this not considered fixed? This was fixed with the upload of libdaq to unstable. I was trying to get the bug tracking system to acknowledge that the problem had been fixed, and snort should be allowed to migrate to testing. As it was fixed it a

Bug#656289: Processed: notfixed 656289 in snort/2.9.2-1, notfound 656289 in snort/2.9.2-1

2012-01-29 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:25:30AM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: The BTS doesn't understand that a bug can be found in snort/2.9.2-1 and fixed in snort/2.9.2-1, so I removed the found in annotation. Thanks for the clarification, I misread the emails to control@b.d.o. Regards Javier -- To

Bug#656289: Processed: notfixed 656289 in snort/2.9.2-1, notfound 656289 in snort/2.9.2-1

2012-01-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 10:25 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: The BTS doesn't understand that a bug can be found in snort/2.9.2-1 and fixed in snort/2.9.2-1, so I removed the found in annotation. The BTS doesn't understand it, because it doesn't make sense. ;-) (either 2.9.2-1 contains the bug, or

Bug#656289: Processed: notfixed 656289 in snort/2.9.2-1, notfound 656289 in snort/2.9.2-1

2012-01-28 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:48:13PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: # err, that didn't work notfixed 656289 snort/2.9.2-1 Bug #656289 {Done: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a j...@debian.org} [snort] snort 2.9.1-1 is uninstallable and unbuildable in unstable due to dependency on