Bug#657465: conserver-client: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

2012-09-07 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:54:11 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Attached is a first attempt to handle the config file in a better > > way. > I found a problem on handling of debconf values > root@wheezy:/etc/conserver# cat console.cf > # default config for console > config * { > mast

Bug#657465: conserver-client: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

2012-09-07 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Gregor On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:03:45AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > Control: tag -1 + patch > > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:36:43 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > > Preparing to replace conserver-client 8.1.16-3 (using > > .../conserver-client_8.1.18-1_amd64.deb) ... > > Unpacking rep

Bug#657465: conserver-client: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

2012-09-03 Thread gregor herrmann
Control: tag -1 + patch On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:36:43 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Preparing to replace conserver-client 8.1.16-3 (using > .../conserver-client_8.1.18-1_amd64.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement conserver-client ... > ... > Setting up conserver-client (8.1.18-1) ... >

Processed: Re: Bug#657465: conserver-client: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

2012-09-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #657465 [conserver-client] conserver-client: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user Added tag(s) patch. -- 657465: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657465 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...

Bug#657465: conserver-client: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

2012-01-26 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: conserver-client Version: 8.1.18-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then prompted the user for an action. As