Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-26 Thread Miguel Telleria de Esteban
Hi Danai, I am happy also that we have been able to work together on this. Thanks for signinng my NMU, this is the first time a package of mine reaches Debian Sid :). Regards, Miguel On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:02:42 +0800 Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote: Hi Miguel I have been battling to

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-25 Thread 韓達耐
Hi Miguel I have been battling to get the biber package to build on people.debian.org but to no avail, and I am no hero with the buildd machines. The debdiff on p.d.o was OK, so I have signed your NMU package. Thank you very much for all your efforts! When I get back, I will get the changes

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-24 Thread Norbert Preining
Danai, On Di, 19 Jun 2012, Danai SAE-HAN wrote: Urgh, just got a half working X.org env. Still skewed, but slightly workable. Thanks for your patience. Off to work now. Any progress here? Freeze is soon! Did you also see the email of Werner concerning a stability fix in CJK? Best wishes

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-24 Thread 韓達耐
Hi On Di, 19 Jun 2012, Danai SAE-HAN wrote: Urgh, just got a half working X.org env. Still skewed, but slightly workable. Thanks for your patience. Off to work now. Any progress here? Freeze is soon! Did you also see the email of Werner concerning a stability fix in CJK? I had to

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-24 Thread 韓達耐
Hi Norbert After some complications I am *finally* able to get into ravel.debian.org. I hope to get both cjk and biber done before going to work. Cheers -- Danai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-18 Thread Danai SAE-HAN
Urgh, just got a half working X.org env. Still skewed, but slightly workable. Thanks for your patience. Off to work now. BR -- Danai SAE-HAN On 18-jun.-2012, at 04:35, Julian Gilbey jul...@d-and-j.net wrote: On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:22:49PM +0800, Danai SAE-HAN (�n�_耐) wrote: So you

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-17 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: On Fr, 15 Jun 2012, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote: - I guess we have to add a epoch 1: otherwise the new version is smaller than what is in sid now I guess that you are talking about the version number of the biber

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-17 Thread Anna Chmielinska
It works! Thank you very much. Regards, Anna. -- Anna Chmielińska -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-17 Thread Norbert Preining
On So, 17 Jun 2012, Julian Gilbey wrote: So you could call this one 0.9.9+release-1 and avoid having to use an epoch. 0.9.9.0+git2012415-1 would also work. It seems a shame to introduce an epoch for a case like this where the version numbers are going to increase pretty soon beyond the

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-17 Thread 韓達耐
Hi all I have just returned to Singapore from a business trip to Beijing, and will look into the biber package after my APT upgrade has finished. On 17 June 2012 17:45, Julian Gilbey jul...@d-and-j.net wrote: On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: On Fr, 15 Jun 2012,

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-17 Thread 韓達耐
Ha, seems like your mail just crossed mine. ;) BR -- Danai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-17 Thread Miguel Telleria de Esteban
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:22:49 +0800 Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote: Hi all I have just returned to Singapore from a business trip to Beijing, and will look into the biber package after my APT upgrade has finished. Cool, Just for completion I have also uploaded a 0.9.9+release-1 package (which is

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-17 Thread 韓達耐
Hi Miguel! On 17 June 2012 22:46, Miguel Telleria de Esteban mig...@mtelleria.com wrote: Just for completion I have also uploaded a 0.9.9+release-1 package (which is nothing more that the previous 1:0.9.9-1 with the version number changed in debian/changelog).

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-17 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:22:49PM +0800, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote: So you could call this one 0.9.9+release-1 and avoid having to use an epoch.  0.9.9.0+git2012415-1 would also work.  It seems a shame to introduce an epoch for a case like this where the version numbers are going

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-17 Thread Danai SAE-HAN
Hi Julian I will use version 0.9.9+release-1 for now, and then use 1.0.0 with pre or rc when biblatex is also upgraded. If you want to do that, remember to use the ~ syntax: 1.0.0~pre1-1 or similar; that way, 1.0.0-1 will be strictly greater than the pre version number! Thanks for the

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-16 Thread Anna Chmielinska
Hello, I have same problem when using biber, and indeed having biber 0.9.9 and biblatex 1.7 in sid, and biber 1.0 beta and biblatex 2.0 beta in experimental sound best for me. I consider this problem really important, because I need biber for my Master thesis which I just need finishing.

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-16 Thread Miguel Telleria de Esteban
Ok, I hope I have done the job correctly :) 1. DSC, build log (with 3 lintian errors and deb of 1:0.9.9-1 http://mtelleria.com/biber/1-0.9.9-1/ http://mtelleria.com/biber/1-0.9.9-1/biber_0.9.9-1.dsc 2. Debdiff (500k) http://mtelleria.com/biber/debdiff/ this is a temporary placement. Please

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-15 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Danai, hi Miguel, On Do, 14 Jun 2012, Danai SAE-HAN wrote: I am currently in Beijing but return home this Sunday. I think downgrading biber is the best option. Ok. Can you please do that when you are back. On Do, 14 Jun 2012, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote:

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-15 Thread Miguel Telleria de Esteban
Hi Norbert, Just to be sure that I understand your instructions :) On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:55:54 +0900 Norbert Preining wrote: [...] Can I suggest that you: - I guess we have to add a epoch 1: otherwise the new version is smaller than what is in sid now I guess that you are talking about

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-15 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Miguel, in a hurry ... On Fr, 15 Jun 2012, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote: - I guess we have to add a epoch 1: otherwise the new version is smaller than what is in sid now I guess that you are talking about the version number of the biber package. Currently in Sid we have

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-14 Thread Miguel Telleria de Esteban
Dear all, In a hope to accelerate the process I have uploaded my packages of biber and biblatex, together with the existing ones in this github repo. https://github.com/mtelleria/biber-biblatex-debian-packaging There you can find, with their respective tags, the upstream and full dirs of:

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-13 Thread Danai SAE-HAN
(Adding the Perl group in CC.) Hi I am currently in Beijing but return home this Sunday. I think downgrading biber is the best option. If that is too late, I am open to support a NMU. Sorry for the inconvenience. BR -- Danai SAE-HAN On 13-jun.-2012, at 07:15, Norbert Preining

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-12 Thread Miguel Telleria de Esteban
Package: biber Version: 0.9.9+git2012426-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear all, Overview With the current Sid situation (even close to release) we have a conflict between the versions of biber and biblatex. Both come from the same upstream author but are

Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex

2012-06-12 Thread Norbert Preining
Dear Danai, dear Jan, How do we go forward with that? It is a bit a pain, I agree. You two guys should agree on what you are shipping. Just for completeness: TeX Live 2012 is shipping: biblatex 1.7 biber 0.9.9 So my tendency is to ship biber 0.9.9 also in Debian, but I leave it completeley up