On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 05:38:37AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
None of these are merged into 0.5.x, has the code diverged so much?
I arrived only today from my two week trip and will work on backports
for 0.7-0.5
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 05:38:37AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
None of these are merged into 0.5.x, has the code diverged so much?
I arrived only today from my two week trip and will work on backports
for 0.7-0.5 this week. Sorry for the delay.
Merry christmas Reinhard,
did you have a
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 05:00:54PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org wrote:
Source: libav
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
it seems that a huge pile of CVE were allocated for ffmpeg/libav
short
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 05:00:54PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org wrote:
Source: libav
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org wrote:
Source: libav
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
it seems that a huge pile of CVE were allocated for ffmpeg/libav
short status update:
Most/all of the CVEs have now been backported upstream.
Source: libav
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
it seems that a huge pile of CVE were allocated for ffmpeg/libav and are
supposed to be fixed in 0.11:
CVE-2012-2772
CVE-2012-2774
CVE-2012-2775
CVE-2012-2776
CVE-2012-2777
CVE-2012-2779
CVE-2012-2782
CVE-2012-2783
6 matches
Mail list logo
