Control: tag -1 + patch
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:41:27 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:49:31 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
wrote:
I started looking at this bug yesterday, the fix is easy but I did not
have time to check all binary packages. Patch to follow if
Processing control commands:
tag -1 + patch
Bug #690148 [gcc-mingw32] gcc-mingw32: missing copyright file after upgrade
from squeeze
Added tag(s) patch.
--
690148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690148
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
tag -1 + pending
Bug #690148 [gcc-mingw32] gcc-mingw32: missing copyright file after upgrade
from squeeze
Added tag(s) pending.
--
690148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690148
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tag -1 + pending
Hi Gregor,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 06:49:12PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
Something like the attached debdiff maybe?
(Note that I haven't built the binary packages, but I've run the
postinst manually in a chroot after a squeeze → wheezy update of
gcc-mingw32.)
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:40:17 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Something like the attached debdiff maybe?
Sorry, I should have tagged the bug pending! Your patch is exactly
what I submitted for Wheezy approval in http://bugs.debian.org/690810
(tested with binary packages, upgrading from Squeeze and
On 2012-10-15 14:13, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 01:33:16AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org (14/10/2012):
Now that gcc-4.6 4.6.3-12 is installed in unstable on all
architectures, would it be possible to give gcc-mingw-w64 back on
all buildds? This
Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:49:31 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
Surely it would be more efficient to do a maintainer upload fixing RC
bug #690148, and you'll get the rebuilds for free?
I started looking at this bug yesterday, the fix is easy but I did not
have
7 matches
Mail list logo