Package: kernel-image
Version: 3.2.0
severity: serious
(kernel-image-3.2.0-4-amd64-di)
Dear developers,
32-bit programs, such as FireFox refuse to work on Debian 7.0 64-bit (amd64).
This is new fresh stock install from di-BETA4 Wheezy DVD. (KDE)
The same works great on Debian 6.0 64-bit !
Control: reassign -1 general
Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com writes:
Package: kernel-image
Version: 3.2.0
severity: serious
(kernel-image-3.2.0-4-amd64-di)
Dear developers,
32-bit programs, such as FireFox refuse to work on Debian 7.0 64-bit (amd64).
This is new fresh stock install
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 general
Bug #697270 [kernel-image] PC 32-bit programs fails to work on amd64
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image'
Bug reassigned from package 'kernel-image' to 'general'.
No longer marked as found in versions 3.2.0.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
User error? Huh ?
No ! This is a Debian Bug !
Debian clearly says: File does not exist, while in fact it DOES EXIST.
This is a 100% proof of Debian bug.
--
-Alexey Eromenko Technologov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Please keep in mind, that I have wasted 4 hours of my personal time on
this Debian bug, and do you think this is reasonable ?
--
-Alexey Eromenko Technologov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 01/04/2013 01:02 AM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
Please keep in mind, that I have wasted 4 hours of my personal time on
this Debian bug, and do you think this is reasonable ?
It all depends.
How did you even install Firefox 32 bits? We don't have such a
package in Debian. It's rebranded as
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
on a 64 bits arch Debian, when really, you'd better just do:
apt-get install iceweasel
and use your newly installed browser in 64 bits mode...
Not, because my job requires the latest FireFox (latest-and-greatest).
And the
Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com writes:
User error? Huh ?
No ! This is a Debian Bug !
Debian clearly says: File does not exist, while in fact it DOES EXIST.
This is a 100% proof of Debian bug.
That's the error message that you get when the dynamic loader for a binary
doesn't exist. I
But having 32-bit LSB compliance will help people a _LOT_.
--
-Alexey Eromenko Technologov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
on a 64 bits arch Debian, when really, you'd better just do:
apt-get install iceweasel
and use your newly installed browser in 64 bits mode...
Not,
On 01/04/2013 01:31 AM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
on a 64 bits arch Debian, when really, you'd better just do:
apt-get install iceweasel
and use your newly installed browser in 64 bits mode...
Not, because my job requires the
Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com writes:
User error? Huh ?
It is, I'm afraid.
No ! This is a Debian Bug !
No, it is not.
Debian clearly says: File does not exist, while in fact it DOES
EXIST.
It does not. However, the file the message is referring to is not the
file you think it refers
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com wrote:
But having 32-bit LSB compliance will help people a _LOT_.
This does not mean you can't run 32bit application under a 64bit
Debian installation, it's because the support is not added into
default installation as the feature
Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com writes:
But having 32-bit LSB compliance will help people a _LOT_.
Debian provides LSB compliance via the lsb set of packages. Not everyone
wants to have all LSB packages installed or particularly cares about LSB
compliance. If you do:
aptitude install
Le jeudi, 3 janvier 2013 18.44:59, Alexey Eromenko a écrit :
But having 32-bit LSB compliance will help people a _LOT_.
By the way:
* Debian is not LSB-certified
* ... but the lsb-* packages try to provide a working implementation.
No work has been attempted to provide Multi-Arch lsb packages
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org wrote:
release and lsb-base being Architecture: foreign). Patches are welcome to make
Wheezy+1 more suitable to your needs.
How about changing it from a kernel bug to tasksel feature ?
I recommend: tasksel to install 32-bit
clone 697270 -1
retitle -1 misleading error message when ELF interpreter does not exist
reassign -1 bash
severity -1 normal
merge -1 609882
retitle 697270 i386 multiarch not enabled and ia32-libs not installed by
default on amd64
severity 697270 minor
tags 697270 +wontfix
thanks
Hi Alexey,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 697270 -1
Bug #697270 {Done: Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org} [general] PC 32-bit
programs fails to work on amd64
Bug 697270 cloned as bug 697299
retitle -1 misleading error message when ELF interpreter does not exist
Bug #697299 {Done
18 matches
Mail list logo
