On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 11:13:09PM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
If you don't intend to actually maintain ceph, please orphan the
package. Otherwise I may do a NMU with the latest version 0.68 in the
next two
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 11:13:09PM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
If you don't intend to actually maintain ceph, please orphan the
package. Otherwise I may do a NMU with the latest version 0.68 in the
next two
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 06:27:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 11:13:09PM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
If you don't intend to actually maintain ceph, please orphan the
package.
Hi Bastian,
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
The version 0.48 was removed from wheezy because it is unsupportable.
In the meantime this is _twenty_ versions behind the last release. This
means it is even less supportable.
Sure, it's very old. Even if that
* László Böszörményi (GCS):
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
The version 0.48 was removed from wheezy because it is unsupportable.
In the meantime this is _twenty_ versions behind the last release. This
means it is even less supportable.
Sure, it's very
5 matches
Mail list logo
