Vincent McIntyre vincent.mcint...@csiro.au (30/04/2013):
gah. The patch was not ok. My apologies for such a gross error.
I caught this by testing with 1.86 as downloaded from the archive.
Thanks, Vincent.
Applied locally. I'll try and play with it, and see when that can be
pushed to unstable,
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 01:47:36AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Vincent McIntyre vincent.mcint...@csiro.au (30/04/2013):
gah. The patch was not ok. My apologies for such a gross error.
I caught this by testing with 1.86 as downloaded from the archive.
Thanks, Vincent.
Applied locally.
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 706112 + wheezy-can-defer
tags 706112 + wheezy-ignore
thanks
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 00:34 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I suggest we work towards having a suitable grub-installer for
inclusion into r1 (which will possibly be released roughly 1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
usertags 706112 + wheezy-can-defer
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: wheezy-can-defer.
tags 706112 +
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (29/04/2013):
I applied and pushed your patch. The maint point is that PO files
get updated by the daily l10n-sync script.
Then, I propose we upload 1.86 immediately to unstable so that it's
tested at least by those people who install unstable with D-I.
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (29/04/2013):
While I haven't reviewed the patch yet, having the l10n bits in sync
was a point I had in mind this very morning, so I'm glad you did
that. And indeed, some feedback ASAP would be nice. I'll try to look
into this patch in a few hours at most.
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (29/04/2013):
While I haven't reviewed the patch yet, having the l10n bits in sync
was a point I had in mind this very morning, so I'm glad you did
that. And indeed, some feedback ASAP would be nice. I'll try to look
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 07:16:42PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (29/04/2013):
While I haven't reviewed the patch yet, having the l10n bits in sync
was a point I had in mind this very morning, so I'm glad you did
Vincent McIntyre vincent.mcint...@csiro.au (30/04/2013):
gah. The patch was not ok. My apologies for such a gross error.
I caught this by testing with 1.86 as downloaded from the archive.
[PATCH] Actually set bootdev.
After taking all the trouble to get the right value into
the $bootdev
Hi,
Thanks for the comments I've received on this patch.
I did some reading to see how other packages handle the issues raised.
I found grub-pc and iso-scan particularly helpful.
Hopefully this attempt is better. Less than a week from release,
I expect it is too late to include this but perhaps it
Quoting Vincent McIntyre (vincent.mcint...@csiro.au):
Hi,
Thanks for the comments I've received on this patch.
I did some reading to see how other packages handle the issues raised.
I found grub-pc and iso-scan particularly helpful.
Hopefully this attempt is better. Less than a week from
11 matches
Mail list logo
