On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:00:46AM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 09/23/2013 10:23 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
hi all,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:16:11AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hello all,
@Louis and Vijay:
Could you please check if the backported patch (see attachment) from
hi all,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:16:11AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hello all,
@Louis and Vijay:
Could you please check if the backported patch (see attachment) from
Salvatore is safe for glusterfs 3.2.7 and give me feedback?
@Salvatore:
Thanks for your work!
Is there anything
On 09/23/2013 10:23 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
hi all,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:16:11AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hello all,
@Louis and Vijay:
Could you please check if the backported patch (see attachment) from
Salvatore is safe for glusterfs 3.2.7 and give me feedback?
Hello all,
@Louis and Vijay:
Could you please check if the backported patch (see attachment) from
Salvatore is safe for glusterfs 3.2.7 and give me feedback?
@Salvatore:
Thanks for your work!
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Bug#722694: Kernel change for #685407 breaks
Package: glusterfs-server
Version: 3.2.7-3
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream fixed-upstream patch
Control: fixed -1 3.4.0-4
Hi Patrick
Note: I have choosen the severity as 'grave' as it makes GlusterFS not
usable under Debian Wheezy when GlusterFS used on ext4 bricks. I'm
also Cc'ing
5 matches
Mail list logo