Bug#726009: Insufficient RAM on build-machines (was Bug#726009: yade: FTBFS on i386 (and others))

2013-10-13 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/12/2013 07:43 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: Thanks all, guys, for recommendations and explanations. I will try to split some large cpp-files as Dmitrijs mentioned (there are a couple of them, which are failing reliably on weak archs), remove some

Bug#726009: Insufficient RAM on build-machines (was Bug#726009: yade: FTBFS on i386 (and others))

2013-10-12 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Anton, On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org wrote: [...] /usr/bin/c++ -Dyade_EXPORTS -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DYADE_PTR_CAST=static_pointer_cast -DYADE_CAST=static_cast -fPIC

Bug#726009: Insufficient RAM on build-machines (was Bug#726009: yade: FTBFS on i386 (and others))

2013-10-12 Thread Anton Gladky
Thanks all, guys, for recommendations and explanations. I will try to split some large cpp-files as Dmitrijs mentioned (there are a couple of them, which are failing reliably on weak archs), remove some optimization options as Mathieu advised and we will see, whether it helps. I would also try to

Bug#726009: Insufficient RAM on build-machines (was Bug#726009: yade: FTBFS on i386 (and others))

2013-10-11 Thread Anton Gladky
severity 726009 wishlist retitle 726009 Yade requires too much RAM for building thanks Hello, thanks for bug-report. The problem is, that all build-failures are due to insufficient RAM on build-machines [1]. I do not really know how to fix that except of backlisting of some machines, as was

Bug#726009: Insufficient RAM on build-machines (was Bug#726009: yade: FTBFS on i386 (and others))

2013-10-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:32:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: severity 726009 serious thanks This remains a serious bug. Your package, which previously built on multiple architectures, is now failing to build due to memory exhaustion. While in some circumstances it is permissible to

Bug#726009: Insufficient RAM on build-machines (was Bug#726009: yade: FTBFS on i386 (and others))

2013-10-11 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 11 October 2013 20:32, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote: severity 726009 serious thanks This remains a serious bug. Your package, which previously built on multiple architectures, is now failing to build due to memory exhaustion. While in some circumstances it is permissible to

Bug#726009: Insufficient RAM on build-machines (was Bug#726009: yade: FTBFS on i386 (and others))

2013-10-11 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:55:34PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: [...] I'm not sure, but launchpad is running 64-bit machines even when compiling for the i386 architecture, and then launchpad supports PAE only and thus can get 4GB of address space. [...] Which bit of 'Physical Address

Bug#726009: Insufficient RAM on build-machines (was Bug#726009: yade: FTBFS on i386 (and others))

2013-10-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:55:34PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: I'm not sure, but launchpad is running 64-bit machines even when compiling for the i386 architecture, and then launchpad supports PAE only and thus can get 4GB of address space. A 32-bit process can still only address 32-bits of

Bug#726009: Insufficient RAM on build-machines (was Bug#726009: yade: FTBFS on i386 (and others))

2013-10-11 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 11 October 2013 22:34, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:55:34PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: [...] I'm not sure, but launchpad is running 64-bit machines even when compiling for the i386 architecture, and then launchpad supports PAE only and thus can