Bug#734172:

2014-03-08 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Federico Gimenez wrote (08 Jan 2014 14:05:01 GMT) : 3.13.0-rc7 apparently fixed the issue. It may have been fixed on 3.12.6 but I didn't test that one. This, added to the fact that Ben tagged this fixed-upstream on January 10, leads me to think that this RC bug could be closed. I would do

Bug#734172: marked as done (linux-image-3.11-2-686-pae: unable to handle kernel paging request at c114873. IP: [c1149fc4] shrink_dentry_list+0x214/0x360)

2014-03-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:38:16 + with message-id 1394325496.2861.61.ca...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk and subject line Re: Bug#734172: has caused the Debian Bug report #734172, regarding linux-image-3.11-2-686-pae: unable to handle kernel paging request at c114873. IP: [c1149fc4

Bug#734172:

2014-01-08 Thread Federico Gimenez
3.13.0-rc7 apparently fixed the issue. It may have been fixed on 3.12.6 but I didn't test that one. I've just tested my backup script which puts some load on a couple of GFS2 filesystems. Last week this would have caused an almost instant crash but this time it finished without issues. -- To

Bug#734172: similar to

2014-01-07 Thread Federico Gimenez
I didn't say it was the same, just that is has some similarities. Both have GFS2 on top of active/active drbd and both break when there is some load in the GFS2 filesystem (my first crash a few weeks ago was with a rm -rf) I agree they affect different functions but they still have some things in

Bug#734172: didn't work

2014-01-06 Thread Federico Gimenez
disabling send_page didn't work. something a simple as a tar from one gfs2 to another made it crash again. :-(

Bug#734172: similar to

2014-01-06 Thread Federico Gimenez
Looks somewhat similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023431

Bug#734172: similar to

2014-01-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 16:08 -0200, Federico Gimenez wrote: Looks somewhat similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023431 I don't think so, that's a BUG versus an Oops and not in the same function. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable

Bug#734172: additional information

2014-01-05 Thread Federico Gimenez
I'm going to test setting this parameter (although I don't use Xen): http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-xen-drbd-mod-params.html Googling around there seems to be a relation between Oops, drbd active/active and this setting. DRBD source code says this which sounds like it could be related:

Bug#734172: linux-image-3.11-2-686-pae: unable to handle kernel paging request at c114873. IP: [c1149fc4] shrink_dentry_list+0x214/0x360

2014-01-04 Thread fgimenez
Package: src:linux Version: 3.11.10-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Not sure what triggers this. The machines are a 2 node cluster with DRBD and GFS2 controlled by Pacemaker+corosync * What exactly did you