On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
The package not working for one of its main purposes does qualify as
severe to me.
I agree. I was suprised that it was working for Martin, glad that you
are confirmed that miracle didn't happen.
I can accept
Quoting László Böszörményi (GCS) g...@debian.org:
I agree. I was suprised that it was working for Martin, glad that you
are confirmed that miracle didn't happen.
But Debian is magic :~)
In short, I don't feel we should carry it around. Ideas / opinions?
Not really. Maybe just leave it as
still doesn't work for me in current unstable. The less version is still
the same.
On 2014-12-01 01:32, Julian Taylor wrote:
still doesn't work for me in current unstable. The less version is still
the same.
Julian, you are right! My testing was wrong: I did not test the
--compile option, but only the LESS/CSS style checker function
(no options), so your bug report remains
The package not working for one of its main purposes does qualify as
severe to me.
I spent significant time tracking this done when using an upstream
system using recess to compile less file.
I can accept lowering the severity when the compile option is removed
from the debian package with a
Julian, I tried with your example and it seems to work now.
Maybe the node-less is newer now than when you tried?
László, could you check and close the bug accordingly?
Thanks and cheers
PS: Too bad, this bug stopped the package from entering Jessie :~(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
6 matches
Mail list logo
