Bug#745444: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#745444: Bug#745444: antpm: FTBFS: antpm-downloader.1: No such file or directory

2014-04-24 Thread Kristof Ralovich
I'll fix it as soon as my travels are over! On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.orgwrote: Quoting Aaron M. Ucko (u...@debian.org): Source: antpm Version: 1.16-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Builds of antpm explicitly

Bug#745444: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#745444: Bug#745444: Bug#745444: antpm: FTBFS: antpm-downloader.1: No such file or directory

2014-04-24 Thread Kristof Ralovich
On 04/24/2014 12:00 PM, Kristof Ralovich wrote: I'll fix it as soon as my travels are over! On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org mailto:bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Aaron M. Ucko (u...@debian.org mailto:u...@debian.org): Source: antpm

Bug#745444: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#745444: antpm: FTBFS: antpm-downloader.1: No such file or directory

2014-04-22 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Aaron M. Ucko (u...@debian.org): Source: antpm Version: 1.16-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Builds of antpm explicitly targetting only its architecture-dependent binary packages (as on the autobuilders, or with debuild -B or the like) have been

Bug#745444: antpm: FTBFS: antpm-downloader.1: No such file or directory

2014-04-21 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Source: antpm Version: 1.16-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Builds of antpm explicitly targetting only its architecture-dependent binary packages (as on the autobuilders, or with debuild -B or the like) have been failing, even though those are in fact its only binary