Hi,
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Steven Yi steve...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know how many users use cs or extract. I guess if we change names,
there's a possibility we might break user's scripts or tools if they depend
on those names. On the other hand, if you're doing renaming for
Hi John,
Shall we rename then to csound_cs?
steven
On Mon Nov 24 2014 at 11:09:26 AM jpff j...@codemist.co.uk wrote:
I would prefer a simpe renaming, despite the pain of completions in the
shell. I do not think we guarantee scripts, just API and csd/orc/sco
files.
==John
On Mon, 24 Nov
I would prefer a simpe renaming, despite the pain of completions in the
shell. I do not think we guarantee scripts, just API and csd/orc/sco
files.
==John
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Steven Yi steve...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know how
On 24 Nov 2014 13:39, jpff j...@codemist.co.uk wrote:
I would prefer a simpe renaming, despite the pain of completions in the shell.
I do not think we guarantee scripts, just API and csd/orc/sco files.
==John
If the renaming is done upstream, we probably can pick a better name
than
Hi Felipe,
I don't know how many users use cs or extract. I guess if we change names,
there's a possibility we might break user's scripts or tools if they depend
on those names. On the other hand, if you're doing renaming for extract
and no one has really complained, I suppose changing cs won't
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
Package: csound,cs
Version: 1:6.03.2~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages
❦ 7 novembre 2014 10:17 -0300, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org :
Vincent, is your upstream amenable to changing the name? The csound cs
utility has been named so since at least 2005, so it would probably
break finger memory for users if I change it. I will ask upstream
anyway.
I'll ask
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
Package: csound,cs
Version: 1:6.03.2~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a
Processing control commands:
tag -1 sid
Bug #768388 [csound,cs] csound,cs: error when trying to install together
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #768388 to the same tags previously set
--
768388: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768388
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 sid
On 2014-11-07 14:17, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I note that since cs is not available in jessie, this bug should be
marked as not affecting jessie... not sure how this is done.
Tagging as sid should suffice unless you need to get an update for
csound into jessie that has to go
There is also a potential conflict with scound-manpages
Selecting previously unselected package cs.
Unpacking cs (from .../archives/cs_0.5.7-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/cs_0.5.7-1_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/cs.1.gz',
Package: csound,cs
Version: 1:6.03.2~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency
12 matches
Mail list logo
