On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 04:06:01PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
asr-manpages unfortunately got removed from testing manually without
explicit reason instead of just waiting for the autoremoval period.
That happened despite there are obvious efforts to fix this issue --
which definitely lowered
Hi again,
asr-manpages unfortunately got removed from testing manually without
explicit reason instead of just waiting for the autoremoval period.
That happened despite there are obvious efforts to fix this issue --
which definitely lowered my motiviation to do an NMU for this issue
once the
On 19/01/15 03:51, Axel Beckert wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 04:06:01PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
asr-manpages unfortunately got removed from testing manually without
explicit reason instead of just waiting for the autoremoval period.
That happened despite there
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 04:06:01PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
asr-manpages unfortunately got removed from testing manually without
explicit reason instead of just waiting for the autoremoval period.
That happened despite there are obvious efforts to fix this issue
Hi,
Riley Baird wrote:
Gah, this anonymous submitter is annoying. His claim that this is
practically impossible is yet to be proved as I'm trying to prove the
opposite.
I am not anonymous.
Just a first name and an anonymous remailer is more or less anonymous
for me.
My name is Riley
Gah, this anonymous submitter is annoying. His claim that this is
practically impossible is yet to be proved as I'm trying to prove the
opposite.
I am not anonymous.
Just a first name and an anonymous remailer is more or less anonymous
for me.
It isn't an anonymous remailer; this is my
Hi Riley,
Riley Baird wrote:
RMS declaring that something doesn't need to be free is weird.
Yeah, he seems to be upset with Debian, because he says that we
distribute non-free software.
Yeah, and Debian considers some licenses by the FSF (namely some GFDL
versions) as non-free, too. IIRC
Hi,
we (The Debian Project) would like to clarify the license situation[1]
of the collection of alt.sysadmin.recovery man pages as seen on
https://sources.debian.net/src/asr-manpages/latest and originally
available at ftp://ftp.winternet.com/users/eric/asr.pages.tar.
[1]
Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
we (The Debian Project) would like to clarify the license situation[1]
of the collection of alt.sysadmin.recovery man pages as seen on
https://sources.debian.net/src/asr-manpages/latest and originally
available at ftp://ftp.winternet.com/users/eric/asr.pages.tar.
9 matches
Mail list logo
