On 2015-02-22 07:43, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
It's not backed up in jessie or later. The backup/md5sum stuff is
preceeded by a test for and old version less than 1.7.4p4-4, so in
wheezy and later, all the md5sum stuff is ignored during
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Christian Kastner wrote:
In wheezy and later, where /etc/sudoers already is a conffile, that is
entirely for dpkg to handle, not for the *.preinst scripts. Anything in
the *.preinst is exclusively for when upgrading from squeeze.
So, the more I think about it,
On 2015-02-22 17:50, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Christian Kastner wrote:
In wheezy and later, where /etc/sudoers already is a conffile, that is
entirely for dpkg to handle, not for the *.preinst scripts. Anything in
the *.preinst is exclusively for when upgrading
On 2015-02-22 02:05, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
I've looked into this now, and I believe that the --compare-versions
issue and the chown/chmod issue is all there is to this bug. I have
attached a new debdiff (v2) with fixes for both.
I
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
I've looked into this now, and I believe that the --compare-versions
issue and the chown/chmod issue is all there is to this bug. I have
attached a new debdiff (v2) with fixes for both.
I reviewed your proposed changes, but I don't think
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
It's not backed up in jessie or later. The backup/md5sum stuff is
preceeded by a test for and old version less than 1.7.4p4-4, so in
wheezy and later, all the md5sum stuff is ignored during upgrades.
It is most certainly backed up in
On 2015-02-07 01:02, Christian Kastner wrote:
I have tested this patch in a number of combinations, including (but not
limited to):
sudo (squeeze) - sudo (jessie) upgrade
sudo-ldap (squeeze) - sudo-ldap (jessie) upgrade
Works as intended. An unchanged
Hi,
On 2015-02-07 01:02, Christian Kastner wrote:
I've looked into this now, and I believe that the --compare-versions
issue and the chown/chmod issue is all there is to this bug. I have
attached a new debdiff (v2) with fixes for both.
I have tested this patch in a number of combinations,
Christian Kastner deb...@kvr.at writes:
Bdale, once such a confirmation (or another fix) is in, how would you
like to proceed? I could help with the RT communication again
Sure. I'm willing to merge a patch and do uploads, but need to know
which path they want me to use since the sudo in
On 2015-02-18 22:32, Bdale Garbee wrote:
Christian Kastner deb...@kvr.at writes:
Bdale, once such a confirmation (or another fix) is in, how would you
like to proceed? I could help with the RT communication again
Sure. I'm willing to merge a patch and do uploads, but need to know
which
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi again,
On 2015-01-30 10:27, Christian Kastner wrote:
On 2015-01-30 00:19, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Which is erroneously moved aside by sudo-ldap.preinst, thereafter dpkg
unpacks sudo-ldap, takes over file ownership (incl. conffiles) from sudo
and once it gets
Control: tags -1 - patch
On 2015-01-30 00:19, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2015-01-29 23:16, Christian Kastner wrote:
Which is erroneously moved aside by sudo-ldap.preinst, thereafter dpkg
unpacks sudo-ldap, takes over file ownership (incl. conffiles) from sudo
and once it gets around to
Hi Andreas,
I'm not quite sure we're on the same page yet, but I'm also not 100%
confident that I'm in the right. So here are some additional thoughts:
On 2015-01-29 09:31, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
And while switching sudo-sudo-ldap the following happens:
sudo gets removed, conffile remains
Hi Christian,
thanks for looking into this.
What we have here is a conffile shared between two packages that
Conflicts+Replaces each other. That's even more weird than placing
conffiles in multi-arch:same packages ... at least they don't ship
different versions (but they did in lenny ...)
I
I just noticed that I completely overlooked your other comments to my
original mail. Sorry about that!
On 2015-01-29 09:31, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2015-01-28 23:56, Christian Kastner wrote:
This is the first problem. It is of course possible for this file to be
generally absent (it's a
On 2015-01-29 21:25, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
just to make notation clear
/etc/sudoers is a *configuration file*, i.e. rules of preserving user
changes apply
since wheezy it is also a *conffile* i.e. shipped with the package at
/etc/sudoers and managed by dpkg, not to be touched by
just to make notation clear
/etc/sudoers is a *configuration file*, i.e. rules of preserving user
changes apply
since wheezy it is also a *conffile* i.e. shipped with the package at
/etc/sudoers and managed by dpkg, not to be touched by maintainer scripts
before it was managed by maintainer
On 2015-01-29 23:16, Christian Kastner wrote:
True. But as you observed in your initial report, the same bug can be
triggered in a clean jessie environment, where the configuration file /
conffile distinction is not a factor.
probably because the md5sums for wheezy and jessie are the same
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:05:52 +0100 Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
The upgrade to jessie with sudo-ldap/jessie went smooth, and thereafter
I wanted to switch to sudo/jessie, which failed due to missing
/etc/sudoers, the problem is reproducible in plain jessie,
Package: sudo
Version: 1.8.10p3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
actually I only wanted to check whether sudo-ldap/wheezy leaving the
obsolete conffile /etc/init.d/sudo after upgrades to jessie could cause
problems. (Does not look like this, but you could consider using
dpkg-maintscript-helper
20 matches
Mail list logo
