Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

Hi Danny, On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:56:59AM +0200, Danny Edel wrote: > > I updated the changelog with dch and it tagged the changes with my name. > The commit is in master. > > I hope its all right. Its perfect. Your input was extremely helpful to get the ball package back in shape and is

Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

On 05/18/2016 08:45 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Could you please add your changes to debian/changelog? If you use > > dch > > it injects a separate section for your ID. Hi Andreas, I updated the changelog with dch and it tagged the changes with my name. The commit is in master. I hope its

Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

Hi Danni, On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 07:13:28PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > I then rebuilt the package on a fresh sid cowbuilder, but now there's a > > new problem (see attachment for the exact error message) near the end of > > the build, involving a static_cast. I can confirm that the

Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

On 05/10/2016 07:13 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Thanks a lot. Your work is really appreciated. Please also be bold and > commit to master. I have no time to look the next 2-3 days - but I'd > like to see the changes in master since I see no point in deriving for > this package what we are doing

Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

Hi Danny, On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 05:39:55PM +0200, Danny Edel wrote: > > sorry for the late reply, but I have been able to commit now. Thank you > for fixing this. I admit I did nothing than writing alioth admins ... but nice to know. :-) > I mirrored my changes as "fix-debian-bug-91"

Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

On 05/04/2016 02:19 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Any success with you alioth commits? Did you possibly pinged alioth > admins via IRC? I'd love to get you properly working as any normal > Debian Med member. If not I'd try to investigate. Hello Andreas, sorry for the late reply, but I have been

Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

Any success with you alioth commits? Did you possibly pinged alioth admins via IRC? I'd love to get you properly working as any normal Debian Med member. If not I'd try to investigate. Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:41:27PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Danny, >

Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

Hi Danny, On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:03:19PM +0200, Danny Edel wrote: > > git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/ball.git > > sorry for the miswording -- I did use the git repository at the > specified location, not collab-maint. If the patch didn't apply cleanly > I can't say why. > > since I

Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:54:03 +0200 Andreas Tille wrote: > Did you created a new repository on collab-maint for this purpose? > It seems you did not used a clone of the packaging Git > > git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/ball.git > Hi Andreas, sorry for the miswording -- I

Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

Hi Danny, On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 04:50:33PM +0200, Danny Edel wrote: > > I have taken on the ball FTBFS again, and have backported more fixes > from the github upstream. It can now compile on a fresh sid. That's *really* appreciated! > The patches 0001-missingSigned.patch and gcc5.diff are

Processed: Re: Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #777791 [src:ball] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) patch. -- 91: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=91 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

Control: tags -1 patch Hello Andreas, I have taken on the ball FTBFS again, and have backported more fixes from the github upstream. It can now compile on a fresh sid. The patches 0001-missingSigned.patch and gcc5.diff are not necessary any more, so I removed them, but I left nopsboxit.patch,

Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

Hello Andreas, I have had some spare time and spent it on the ball package. I hope that helps you in getting the package back into Debian. Some notes regarding the patch: * I dropped the gcc5.patch, since it created an ambiguous overload of getline -- Upstream added one themselves in the

Bug#777791: [PATCH] ball: ftbfs with GCC-5

Hi Danny, thanks for your continuous work on this which is really appreciated. On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 05:34:53PM +0100, Danny Edel wrote: > I have had some spare time and spent it on the ball package. I hope > that helps you in getting the package back into Debian. > > Some notes regarding