On 25 April 2015 at 10:56, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Why does the symbols file include private symbols (i.e. why are
supposedly private symbols being exported by the library in the first
place)?
I don't know. I did ask upstream about it in their bug #1565 [1] and
got the
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 14:02:29 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 16-04-15 07:31, Graham Inggs wrote:
If you uploaded 2.3.4-6.2 now, could it cause any harm? At least this
will get the package built and Release Team can still decide whether
to grant the unblock request or not.
I uploaded
On 16-04-15 07:31, Graham Inggs wrote:
If you uploaded 2.3.4-6.2 now, could it cause any harm? At least this
will get the package built and Release Team can still decide whether
to grant the unblock request or not.
I uploaded the package 2.3.4-8 (I couldn't call it a NMU ;) about an
hour ago
retitle 782381 pre-approval: unblock: motif/2.3.4-6.2
thanks
On 16/04/2015 07:46, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Graham Inggs wrote:
If you uploaded 2.3.4-6.2 now, could it cause any harm? At least this
will get the package built and Release Team can still decide
Hi all,
All the builds of motif failed [1] due to a missing symbol. What are we
going to do? I saw that Graham already choose to just remove the symbol
from the Ubuntu package. I believe that this is really a no-no,
especially without careful investigation if other packages are using
this symbol
On 15 April 2015 at 21:12, Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org wrote:
I saw that Graham already choose to just remove the symbol
from the Ubuntu package. I believe that this is really a no-no,
especially without careful investigation if other packages are using
this symbol and this late in the
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi all,
All the builds of motif failed [1] due to a missing symbol. What are we
going to do? I saw that Graham already choose to just remove the symbol
from the Ubuntu package. I believe that this is really a no-no,
especially without
Hi Michael
On 16 April 2015 at 02:29, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote:
Upstream intends that symbol to be private, so it should be unused in
other packages. But for confidence that it doesn't lead to breakage,
someone should build test the reverse dependencies, which is a large
8 matches
Mail list logo
